Posted on 08/04/2007 1:42:27 PM PDT by Delacon
While politicians have hacked and sloughed their way through the issue of illegal immigration, one sheriff in Atlanta has taken matters into his own hands by doing what the law already allows law enforcement to do -- begin deportation proceedings against illegal aliens who are charged with crimes.
Cobb County is a large, upscale and well-run county just north of the city limits of Atlanta. Once known for a more radical conservative tone, the county is now thought of as a moderate-to-conservative area more interested in promoting economic growth and the arts than promoting political agendas. I say that because the actions of the county's sheriff, Neil Warren, and his chief deputy, Lynda Coker, reflect not some Maricopa County brand of "hang 'em high" justice, but rather a businesslike approach to dealing with the issue of illegal immigrants.
In essence Warren's team is doing the one thing that every law enforcement agency in America could and should be doing, taking advantage of the existing laws and programs that could have an immediate impact on illegal immigration throughout America.
Cobb County sheriff's deputies have been trained by federal immigration officials as to what to look for and how to examine documents in order to determine whether someone arrested and placed in their custody is a legal resident. There may well be other law enforcement organizations in the nation that have availed themselves of such training and are also determining the status of those in their system. The difference is that Sheriff Warren is taking the opportunity that federal law also provides. He and his department have started to initiate, on their own, deportation proceedings once a determination is made that an individual in their custody is in the United States illegally.
In the four weeks since the Georgia county began its new program, removal proceedings have commenced against 42 individuals who either committed crimes or were pending trial for a lesser offense. Those who commit serious felonies are held for trial first, with the issue of deportation to be dealt with after their case is concluded.
It's important to note that the county works with federal officials, and that federal immigration officials must review the case before it goes before a judge. In other words, this is not fly by night justice. It is, truly, businesslike.
Some in the Hispanic community have argued that this strict enforcement has created a "chilling effect" in their community, saying that it causes those who might be here illegally to avoid reporting crimes or testifying at trials. That's nonsense. The program that the Cobb sheriff's office has developed doesn't run status checks on witnesses or victims.
Every poll I've examined shows that, while some Americans might support some system of allowing illegal immigrants to earn their way into the country, a huge majority of Americans are adamant that current laws, at the very least, be enforced. Warren's critics will find themselves with few Americans, Democrat or Republican, who oppose his program.
Sheriff Warren is not alone in dealing with the illegal immigration crisis. According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, jailers throughout the nation have identified some 20,000 illegal immigrants using cooperative agreements with federal enforcement officials. How many actually initiated deportation procedures is unknown. Regardless, that number is just a drop in the bucket.
The fact is that most sheriffs and police departments in America have not gone to the trouble of obtaining federal training, much less have they taken the additional step of initiating deportation proceedings against those who are illegally in the country -- which in and of itself is breaking the law -- and then violate the law while illegally here.
One reason we don't see a nationwide run on such tight enforcement is, big shock, Washington hasn't provided enough funding to educate every local law enforcement agency, nor has money been appropriated to handle the deluge of deportations that would occur should every sheriff or police chief decide to follow the lead of Warren and others who have implemented such aggressive programs.
Perhaps if Congress wanted to get back into the good graces of the American people with respect to this entire immigration issue, it could start by embracing the efforts of those like Sheriff Warren and join with the Bush administration in at least funding this effort to send "illegal illegals" back home. I know if I were running for re-election to the Senate or for president, I'd want my picture taken with Sheriff Neil Warren of Georgia. At least he's doing something about an issue that Americans want addressed.
Love it. These are the sort of communities I want to live in. Unfortunately I live in a sanctuary city (LA) and want to move to another city that is run pretty much by liberals and (liberal Mexican Americans) that are illegal and gang friendly. (Santa Barbara). It incenses me that Californians are so dedicated to handing their state over. I am inspired by these sort of communities that say . . . “NO MORE!!” and mean it.
Ping
Didn't Iran just deport over one million Arabs? Eisenhower deported large numbers without a fuss. And Washington politicians now lie to us that "it cannot be done." Homeland Security has turned into Homeland Insecurity.
Would love to have a Sheriff Warren clone in our town.~
All the excuses thrown out by the criminal defenders for not enforcing the law are non-sensical. Even assuming that were not, society has the right and the obligation to ignore those arguments to prevent the greater damage to innocent legal residents and citizens.
Why they are given any importance whatsoever, escapes me.
Radical conservative tone? this chowderhead writer has got to be some kind of moon bat.
Idiotology? I love it.
“All the excuses thrown out by the criminal defenders for not enforcing the law are non-sensical. Even assuming that were not, society has the right and the obligation to ignore those arguments to prevent the greater damage to innocent legal residents and citizens.”
I’ll go you one further. The argument that illegals can’t report crimes for fear of being deported is an argument FOR clamping down on illegal immigration. See, being illegal means you DO live outside the law. As such, illegals can’t avail themselves of its protections and privileges. Illegals can’t unionize, seek redress in courts(usually, thanks alot Hazelton judge), etc. Allowing illegals to freely come into the country is almost an inhumane thing to do to them as the criminal element and indifferent citizenry prey on them knowing they have no redress. Put it that way to the next bleeding heart liberal you meet.
bump
Bravo!
We can prioritize on violent criminal illegals, but over the long run, all illegal aliens must go, and reapply legally and wait their 10-15 years (which many of them won') as the border fence/wall goes up.
I for one would like Tom or Duncan to vett and introduce this kind of legislation in the House of Representatives, despite their busy campaigns for President.
I for one would like Tom or Duncan to vett and introduce this kind of legislation in the House of Representatives, despite their busy campaigns for President.
slow server, double post
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.