You spin like a democrat. The point you orignally made wasn ‘t AT ALL the point of my post. As I said, YOU DIDN’T GET IT.
Did you or did you not write the following?
"That was because Mitt was taking a political moral position that disagreed with the LDS position. His presidential platform is morally in line with his church. There would be no need to consult them."
It was this post..that I responded to. And none other.
Maybe I could ask this question.
Is there a difference between a "political moral position" and a Mormon moral position?
Ok, I know I asked two questions......
Will you answer them?