Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/03/2007 11:41:52 AM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rellimpank; kiriath_jearim; Little Bill; mojo114; padre35; Harrius Magnus; spikeytx86; ...

Ping to a Republican-American Editorial.

If you want on or off this list, let me know.


2 posted on 08/03/2007 11:42:59 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

You should know by now that the Anti-American Civil Liberties Union is a hypocritical, America-hating organization. Anyone who would help or support them has tapioca for brains.


3 posted on 08/03/2007 11:48:23 AM PDT by andonte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58
If Hazleton's effort to curb illegal immigration by usurping federal authority was unlawful,

I guess it must follow that it's unlawful for states and cities to go after drug pushers for the same reason.

(Not that I support the War on Drugs.)

4 posted on 08/03/2007 11:58:26 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58
Facing a severe budget deficit that would render it unable to afford to meet its obligations to its own citizens, the city is issuing ID cards to anyone who asks for one and is able to prove residency. The idea is to help illegals open bank accounts so they don't have to rely on cash transactions and, more broadly, to bring them into the open as contributing members of society.

Am I the only one to see the dishonest trap here?
By failing to qualify "residency", it renders all the U.S. immigration laws null and void by virtue of inaction on the part of the Federal government.
This power can never be a "local" one, no matter how "well-intentioned". Two wrongs still don't make a "right".

For a minute there, I was excited that the town was asking its legal residents to voluntarily prove legal status, since doing the "reverse" hurts the feelings of the illegal criminals and, presumably, Judge Munley.

6 posted on 08/03/2007 12:55:44 PM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

Let the “far, far better thing (we) do than (we) have ever done before” be the deportation of 25,000,000 illegal aliens...


7 posted on 08/03/2007 12:56:43 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

yep


8 posted on 08/03/2007 1:05:56 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..

ping


9 posted on 08/03/2007 2:11:19 PM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58
From GlennBeck.com:

MAYOR BARLETTA: And a federal judge has granted that. And, you know, he made the claim that by removing illegal aliens, we will effect foreign alliances.

GLENN: That’s not his job.

MAYOR BARLETTA: That we should have contacted foreign countries to ask them if it’s okay to remove illegal aliens.

GLENN: He did not say that. Wait, wait, wait, wait. He did not say that.

MAYOR BARLETTA: I was asked during the trial when I was on the stand if I had called President Calderon to tell him about this ordinance before we passed it. And in the judge’s decision he said, by removing illegal aliens, we will effect foreign alliances.

GLENN: Let me tell you something. Anybody who said Mex-Ameri-Canada, that I was crazy for Mex-Ameri-Canada, here it is. We are now asking permission if we can enforce our own laws here? What was your response to him? MAYOR BARLETTA: I laughed. I thought the joke was a lighter moment in the trial, but the ACLU attorney was serious and obviously the judge agreed because he felt that we should have checked with other countries before we passed this law.

The judge also made the claim that the federal government wants some illegal aliens to remain in the country, that the government wants a balance, by closing off the border but allowing some illegal aliens in the interior. Now, I don’t know what law in this country of America said that we want illegal aliens to remain in the interior of the country, and this judge obviously was imposing his own views, and we need...

This judge needs to be disbarred.

12 posted on 08/03/2007 2:39:19 PM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Graybeard58

13 posted on 08/03/2007 3:03:21 PM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson