Posted on 08/01/2007 6:59:32 AM PDT by ParsifalCA
I am warning those who have not finished the series . . . and there must be still a few of them by now. . . that there are spoilers ahead. I have just finished the last book . . . having spent an enjoyable evening with it thanks to Sams Club and an indulgent wife.
I am done with Harry Potter and enjoying the literary aftertaste the way one enjoys a fine meal almost as much after it is done as when it is being consumed . . . though it is a bit sad that the series is finished.
And it is really finished . . .
Will one be able to re-read the books with pleasure?
I think the answer is only a tentative yes. If one knows the puzzles and the secrets of the book, it will not take away the charm of the characters or the fun of a good Quidditch match, but the first read will always be the best.
The strength of these books is in the plot and the second read, when everything is known, will be satisfying for finding all the clues to what happens . . . but I am hard pressed to know if I will want to re-read them a third or fourth time.
A really great book is as good on the fourth read . . . and some childrens books (Little White Horse) are better.
I deeply enjoyed the last book and thought the ending satisfying. For those who found them quite Christian, they will find much in this last book to give strength to their idea.
(Excerpt) Read more at exilestreet.com ...
“No, but if I told you why, I’d probably get a time-out.”
Then freepmail me.
” You haven’t produced a single bit of evidence that HP is occultism”
Exactly what kind of evidence would you require? Characters engaging in commonly known occultic practices?
Nah. There's never been an original Harry Potter thread. The participants may change, but the arguments are always the same.
Cliff Notes Version:
"Harry Potter is the devil."
No, he's not.
Nagini: "I hate muggles."
Now you're caught up.
Interesting that you’d ping me when I haven’t posted on this thread at all due to being out of town all day. Though my husband has been keeping up our end I see.
I think we’re just offended by your sweeping statements at the beginning.
And again, I think the problem is we don’t believe Harry Potter is occultism, we believe it’s fantasy.
Now where have I heard that before?
Actually Jen, I think that was a copy from a post I pinged you to.
Calvinism threads, homeschooling threads, any thread with the term "illegal alien," any thread involving Giuliani, or any thread involving Terri Schaivo?
It most certainly is fantasy.
But it’s heavily laced with real occultic imagery and themes. And, for the most part, it presents this material in a neutral, judgement-free way. Occultism is not a game - it can utterly ruin lives. I have seen it do so.
I was being a ~little~ sarcastic.
What real occultic imagery and themes? I mean really, not just what stupid D&D playing wiccans take from Greek mythology.
There is a difference between occultism and fantasy magic. One is waving a wand and yelling “Wingardium Leviosa” and the other is sacrificing virgins on a pagan altar. Neither accomplishes much but the second leaves more scars.
No, it's mostly a mish-mash of Greek & Roman myths, Star Wars, and bad Latin.
The audience would be on its feet.
“What real occultic imagery and themes?”
Mirrors as communication devices, automatic writing, astral projection, backfire curses, aura reading, generational witchcraft, spiritual posession etc.
I agree with you there. I hope we get to see Prof. McGonagall leading a squadron of desks into battle in the final movie! ;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.