Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Range Fuels building the Nation's First Commercial Cellulosic Ethanol Plant
AutoBlogGreen ^ | 7/5/2007 | Shane Addie

Posted on 07/28/2007 7:45:52 PM PDT by P-40

Cellulosic ethanol is the next step in making a definitive replacement for foreign oil. The reality is becoming ever closer, now in large part due to Range Fuels. The State of Georgia has just awarded them a permit to build the first plant to employ their patented technology to produce 100 million gallons of cellulosic ethanol per year.

Part of the apparent brilliance to the K2 process, as it is called, is that it is a modular design, meaning the processing equipment can be scaled to the need and location, and doesn't necessarily require a monstrous factory. Theoretically, a biomass supplier could cut transportation expenses by sending their material directly into an on-site processor, making the whole thing much more efficient. The K2 process eliminates expensive enzymes by using a two-step thermo-chemical conversion, first converting the biomass into a synthesis gas, and then processing the gas into ethanol.

This new technology and first of many plants employing it is beneficial for two main reasons. We've already covered the lessened dependency on foreign oil. It also means that with the alleged simplicity and adaptability of this processing method, we could see a boom in the number of ethanol plants across the country, thereby producing much more supply of ethanol, lessening demand, and lowering the price to something far more competitive to gasoline. That would then make the decreased efficiency of ethanol-burning engines more tolerable. Of course, as that technology advances as well, fuel efficiency could soon be on par with its oil-based competition.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: agw; cellulosic; energy; ethanol
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
Related:

http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/02/08/range-fuels-ex-kergy-will-open-wood-waste-using-cellulosic-eth/

Range Fuels (ex-Kergy) will open wood-waste-using cellulosic ethanol plant in Georgia

Posted Feb 8th 2007 2:08PM by Sebastian Blanco Filed under: Emerging Technologies, Ethanol, Manufacturing/Plants

Range Fuels, Inc., known until just the other day as Kergy, Inc., will build a cellulosic ethanol plant in Georgia to turn wood waste into the biofuel. Range Fuels says its proprietary cellulosic ethanol technology can turn wood chips, agricultural wastes, grasses, cornstalks, hog manure, municipal garbage, sawdust or paper pulp (whew) into ethanol. Without using enzymes, the K2 system first turns the biomass into a synthetic gas and then into ethanol.

This new plant will be funded by Vinod Khosla's Khosla Ventures (Range Fuels itself is privately owned by Khosla Ventures) and can potentially create one million gallons of ethanol a year, along with and 70 new jobs. Khosla recently said at a Reuters Global Biofuels Summit that he thinks cellulosic fuel prices could sink to $1 per gallon within 10 years, and that would make them very attractive at the pump.

This cellulosic ethanol plant is a big step forward, since most ethanol plants in America use corn or soy as the biomass feedstock. Turning a waste product into fuel seems like a no-brainer. I'm not entirely sure if this waste is lumber industry by-product or things like fallen branches. The former seems much more likely, but the company's announcement reads, "Wood waste from the state's millions of acres of indigenous Georgia Pine will be the main source of biomass for the ethanol production." So, what does that mean exactly?
1 posted on 07/28/2007 7:45:53 PM PDT by P-40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: P-40

I believe with the cellulosic ethanol production we’ll be able to use all kinds of waste products like grass clippings, corn stalks etc.


2 posted on 07/28/2007 7:52:04 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Greed is NOT a conservative ideal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-40
"Wood waste from the state's millions of acres of indigenous Georgia Pine will be the main source of biomass for the ethanol production."

About the only way this could make economic sense (if that is possible) is that their feed stock consist of materials they are paid to take.

3 posted on 07/28/2007 7:53:39 PM PDT by Pontiac (Patriotism is the natural consequence of having a free mind in a free society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

That would be nice. The city here already has a lawn waste pick up day. Might as well do something with the stuff besides feed it to the landfill.


4 posted on 07/28/2007 7:55:30 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

If their feedstock is to be garbage, that may very well be the case.


5 posted on 07/28/2007 7:57:01 PM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: P-40
The K2 process eliminates expensive enzymes by using a two-step thermo-chemical conversion, first converting the biomass into a synthesis gas, and then processing the gas into ethanol.

This sound very much like the process of Coal gasification and then making ethanol from that gas which was pioneered during WW II.

The problem with using cellulose is that it is not conceivable to me that the BTUs in could be greater than the BTUs out.

6 posted on 07/28/2007 7:58:51 PM PDT by Pontiac (Patriotism is the natural consequence of having a free mind in a free society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-40
The K2 process eliminates expensive enzymes by using a two-step thermo-chemical conversion, first converting the biomass into a synthesis gas, and then processing the gas into ethanol.

Making syngas is great, but why convert that into a crappy fuel like ethanol?

7 posted on 07/28/2007 8:02:04 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Ethanol isn’t really a crappy fuel; although somewhat less dense and more caustic than gasoline, it burns fine in properly designed engines. It might be easier chemically (and politically) to convert the unnamed intermediate “synthetic gas” to ethanol than to another fuel. It also might make for some interesting but crowd-pleasing flavors of mixed drinks at the local bar.


8 posted on 07/28/2007 8:08:34 PM PDT by dufekin (Name the leader of our enemy: Islamic Republic of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, terrorist dictator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac

You can bet tax money factors into their economic viability.


9 posted on 07/28/2007 8:11:33 PM PDT by dangerdoc (dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dufekin

Don’t forget how ethanol absorbs moisture. It’s a crappy fuel. Syngas can be converted into real fuels like gasoline and diesel.


10 posted on 07/28/2007 8:12:41 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: P-40

Less than a dollar a gallon? Bring it on - less money for the muslims and russians.


11 posted on 07/28/2007 8:17:20 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-40

Interesting...we’ll see how it goes.


12 posted on 07/28/2007 8:31:27 PM PDT by Rick_Michael (The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spanalot

Ethanol for a buck = 100 proof Vodka for 10 cents a fifth .... sure.

Rush to get in on this one folks.


13 posted on 07/28/2007 8:46:37 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: P-40

Just read this elsewhere. I think I’ll take a look at their site, and see how reasonable they sound.

“Groundbreaking for the 100-million-gallon-per-year cellulosic ethanol plant will take place this summer, with phase one of the plant scheduled to complete construction in 2008, bringing a production capacity of 20 million gallons a year online”

http://www.industryweek.com/ReadArticle.aspx?ArticleID=14637


14 posted on 07/28/2007 8:51:39 PM PDT by Rick_Michael (The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson

Drink enough of the latter and you won’t go anywhere...ha.


15 posted on 07/28/2007 8:54:17 PM PDT by Rick_Michael (The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rick_Michael

Looks like an Indian got the deal while cynics and Luddites scoff.


16 posted on 07/28/2007 8:59:10 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (Have you have gotten mixed up in a mish-masher?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: P-40; All

Well, either they’re screwing us (and our government) or they’re reputable....and getting a kick-off to something good.

Time we’ll tell.

http://www.rangefuels.com/news_highlights

“Range Fuels announced February 28, 2007 that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) awarded the company up to $76 million to build the first commercial cellulosic ethanol plant in the U.S. at a site near Soperton, Georgia. The DOE awarded Range Fuels the grant after a rigorous competitive process that included a detailed technology review, an assessment of the availability of nearby renewable and sustainable non-food biomass feedstock supplies, and an evaluation of the company’s ability to successfully commercialize and replicate the project at other locations.”


17 posted on 07/28/2007 8:59:27 PM PDT by Rick_Michael (The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-40

Great, another process that uses more energy that it makes, and provides a less efficient fuel than gas. We just need to get rid if the commie environmentalists, and we have all the fuel we need.


18 posted on 07/28/2007 9:01:32 PM PDT by Clam Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

If it’s using wastes for feedstocks, fine, but croplands should not be used for fuel production. Ethanol is not a good fuel, either.


19 posted on 07/28/2007 9:04:20 PM PDT by Clam Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: P-40

Cudzu is the answer!!!!


20 posted on 07/28/2007 9:05:12 PM PDT by dusttoyou (FredHead from the git go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson