[paltz]

These are encouraging developments, but free-speech advocates shouldn’t count too heavily on the Supremes to do the heavy lifting. The main reason that the Court decided last term’s cases differently from McConnell is that Justice Alito had replaced Justice O’Connor, giving the Court a 5–4 majority in favor of a more robust interpretation of the First Amendment. But two members of that majority are over age 70. It is unlikely that President Bush will get another judicial appointment; it is equally unlikely that a Democratic president, or a President McCain, would appoint pro-speech judges to the Court.

take heed single issue voters

[paltz]

bttt

[Free Speech Becky]

You’ve written about our free speech litigation against the CO Secretary of State when two of our neighbors tried to shut us up saying we were in violation of campaign finance laws. I thought you might be interested in the outcome of our case.

http://beckyland.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/why-im-going-to-be-on-2020