Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul Lends His Views on SOX 5 Years Later[Sarbanes-Oxley]
Audit Trail ^ | 18 July 2007 | Audit Trail

Posted on 07/20/2007 8:06:04 AM PDT by BGHater

Audit Trail recently sat down with 2008 Presidential Candidate Ron Paul, R-TX, to get his views on Sarbanes-Oxley 5 Years Later, as one of only three members of congress at the time to vote against the bill.

Audit Trail: It has been five years since the passage of Sarbanes-Oxley. Has your initial position on the legislation changed, or do you still believe it was an overreaction to a real problem?

Ron Paul: The damage inflicted on American businesses and capitol markets by Sarbanes-Oxley has strengthened my conviction that this legislation should be repealed. In 2000, nine of every ten dollars raised by foreign companies were raised in the United States. In 2005, nine of the ten largest offerings were not registered in the United States, and, of the largest twenty-five global offerings, only one took place in the US. The number of public companies going private increased from 143 in 2001 to 245 in 2004. Sarbanes-Oxley is a, if not the, major reason companies are fleeing America’s capital markets. Furthermore, according to some estimates, Sarbanes-Oxley has cost the very investors the law claims to protect at least $1.4 trillion. How could anyone regret voting against such a harmful bill?

AT: What has been most surprising to you as you look at what has happened since Sarbanes-Oxley was enacted?

RP: The solid consensus that today exists among Representatives of both parties and the regulatory bodies charged with enforcing Sarbanes-Oxley is that this legislation, which Congress overwhelmingly passed and the administration heralded as a great achievement, was poorly drafted and that small businesses need relief from the unintended consequences of the law.

AT: Do you think the recent changes that the SEC and PCAOB have made with respect to SOX 404 will be successful in easing the burden of compliance? Do they go far enough?

RP: No, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s new regulations implementing Section 404 do not go nearly far enough in lifting the unjustified burdens Sarbanes-Oxley imposed on America’s economy.

Sarbanes-Oxley expert John Berlau, director of the Center for Entrepreneurship at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, said of the new rule that “Simply proclaiming that audits should be ‘risk-based’ won’t make them so, as long as the other mandates of this auditing standard remain in place. Auditors and companies will still face potential liability for not looking at every last process that could be deemed an ‘internal control,’ even if it has little relevance for shareholders. And the big accounting firms will also still have the big incentive to find every last ‘internal control’ they can audit and bill for.”

Of course, the regulators can only go so far in relieving the burden of Sarbanes-Oxley; it is up to Congress to correct the mistake it made when it rushed this unconstitutional, anti-prosperity, and anti-liberty bill into law.

AT: Is Sarbanes-Oxley still top of mind for you? Do you follow developments closely?

RP: Reform, or even repeal, of Sarbanes-Oxley remains one of my top priorities. As a member of the House Committee on Financial Services, I intend to continue to be an active participant in the debate over Sarbanes-Oxley and similar legislation.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bailout; business; oxley; ronpaul; sarbanes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 07/20/2007 8:06:06 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

bttt


2 posted on 07/20/2007 8:07:22 AM PDT by stainlessbanner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

London & Hong Kong love Sarbanes Oxley.

For everyone else, it’s a trainwreck.


3 posted on 07/20/2007 8:09:43 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (it's the end of the world as we know it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

SOX = The IT Full-Employment Act


4 posted on 07/20/2007 8:10:21 AM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Lemme see if I get this:

RP goes aginst the establishment.

RP proven correct.

Does this mean the establishment was wrong?

Or am I missing something?

5 posted on 07/20/2007 8:17:12 AM PDT by Designer (I'm just sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: BGHater
Maybe Ron Paul should vote to defund enforcement if Sarbox as well.

This guy is crazy and dangerous. His opposition to the war is one thing, but supporting a move to cut funding for our troops borders on, if it isn't already, criminal.

7 posted on 07/20/2007 8:26:47 AM PDT by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
"His opposition to the war is one thing, but supporting a move to cut funding for our troops borders on, if it isn't already, criminal."

The only part of government that I want big, is the military, but Ron Paul wants that to be small as well.

8 posted on 07/20/2007 8:34:39 AM PDT by lormand (Ron Paul - Surrender Monkey for GOP nominee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

You got that right. I have been getting $130/hr for the past 2 years applying SOX controls to Fannie Mae during their restatement.


9 posted on 07/20/2007 8:37:48 AM PDT by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman
London & Hong Kong love Sarbanes Oxley.

Don't forget Bangalore too.

10 posted on 07/20/2007 8:41:06 AM PDT by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lormand
The damage inflicted on American businesses and capitol markets by Sarbanes-Oxley has strengthened my conviction that this legislation should be repealed. In 2000, nine of every ten dollars raised by foreign companies were raised in the United States. In 2005, nine of the ten largest offerings were not registered in the United States, and, of the largest twenty-five global offerings, only one took place in the US. The number of public companies going private increased from 143 in 2001 to 245 in 2004.

...can anyone explain to me why Sarbanes-Oxley with its monstrous effects was jammed through by a supposedly pro-business Republican congress and president???

Just curious...

...and Why exactly am I a member of this party...
11 posted on 07/20/2007 8:43:54 AM PDT by Frobenius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
SOX = The IT Full-Employment Act

Yeah, employment doing meaningless work. There are projects that we don't even bother attempting because the compliance requirements would be too duanting.

12 posted on 07/20/2007 8:44:03 AM PDT by Mannaggia l'America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mannaggia l'America
Don't forget Bangalore too.

Our Bangalore developers have to jump through all the hoops just like we do. This is due to the fact that the software releases happen on American servers, even if the work was done over there.

13 posted on 07/20/2007 8:47:38 AM PDT by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Yup. gota love it. Keeps this CISSP in Busuness...


14 posted on 07/20/2007 8:52:30 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Hillary has already beat Rudy, She is the better cross-dresser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

Way too much Ron Paul stuff being posted on this website. He’s only getting 1% or less right now folks. Get out of your fantasy world and get real. We have business to do. We have to decide on a real candidate who can get the job done and win the next election. 99% of those polled have repeatedly told you that Ron Paul is not that candidate.


15 posted on 07/20/2007 8:52:30 AM PDT by Martins kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LetsRok

Cool...


16 posted on 07/20/2007 8:53:19 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Hillary has already beat Rudy, She is the better cross-dresser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Martins kid

Dude, adjust your Spam. We are talking about SOX here.


17 posted on 07/20/2007 8:55:07 AM PDT by BGHater (My Tagline will defend freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mannaggia l'America

Aw, but that’s have the fun. Anytime I get bored I pull out COBIT and see what mayhem I can cause, then think better of it as a professional...


18 posted on 07/20/2007 8:55:51 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Hillary has already beat Rudy, She is the better cross-dresser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lormand

I want a big strong defense. Lots of husky young lads defending my freedom. I don’t give a rat’s ass about defending South Korea. Or Iraq for that matter. Let them all kill each other.


19 posted on 07/20/2007 8:55:52 AM PDT by AndreaThorn (The dogs of war don't negotiate......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22

have should be half, late night with Microsoft. Expensive date those guys...


20 posted on 07/20/2007 8:57:18 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (Hillary has already beat Rudy, She is the better cross-dresser.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson