Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jude24
I think that's always good advice.

BUT, in this case I trust Phil to have vetted it, and the nolle prossequi is kind of a hint of (a) the snarky unwillingness of the Commonwealth Attorney to say "We blew it," but also (b) the realization that the deputies had kicked a hornet's nest and they were going to lose if it came to trial.

33 posted on 07/20/2007 5:55:24 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawg

In my opinion they only had one question to ask this gentleman and that was to see his permit. I believe they are liable for everything after that point. They should be severely reprimanded for either their callous disregard for the law or their gross ignorance. With the number of officers involved it’s not too much to ask that at least one of them know what the hell they’re doing! Arrogance or incompetence.


36 posted on 07/20/2007 6:05:00 AM PDT by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson