To: Beelzebubba
Woo-hoo!
Its about time that we get this issue resolved. Yeah -- right !!
This "resolution" you seek; would this be from the same fraternity:
- That has members who can't tell what "IS" is?
- The same as those who believe that "PROPERTY" can be taken against the Lawful Owners will for purely Tax Income reasons?
- Have allowed the civil police powers to become "a Standing Army" with limited Public oversight?
- Have allowed Corporations to acquire the same rights as Man?
- Has in several cases been noticed that "the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void," yet have allowed the UN to mandate actions by other Departments of our Government, incuding The Supreme Court?
You mean that gang of oligarchs will craft a Constitutional response that holds "shall not be infringed." will not be restricted to government use only?
I won't hold my breath !!
80 posted on
07/16/2007 9:44:25 AM PDT by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
To: brityank
The Supremes will hear the case, rule against DC, and find some weaselly way to avoid the “individual right” ruling that we all want to see.
They’ll have their cake and eat it too.
115 posted on
07/16/2007 10:48:11 AM PDT by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson