[Atlas Sneezed]

Woo-hoo!

It’s about time that we get this issue resolved.

[from occupied ga]

Woo-hoo! It’s about time that we get this issue resolved.

What makes you think that the supremes will hear the case or more importantly find in favor of the individual right?

[COBOL2Java]

It’s about time that we get this issue resolved.

Imagine what the outcome would be if there had been Democrats in the White House these last 7 1/2 years...

[brityank]

Woo-hoo!

It’s about time that we get this issue resolved.

Yeah -- right !!

This "resolution" you seek; would this be from the same fraternity:

• That has members who can't tell what "IS" is?
  
  
• The same as those who believe that "PROPERTY" can be taken against the Lawful Owners will for purely Tax Income reasons?
  
  
• Have allowed the civil police powers to become "a Standing Army" with limited Public oversight?
  
  
• Have allowed Corporations to acquire the same rights as Man?
  
  
• Has in several cases been noticed that "the particular phraseology of the constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void," yet have allowed the UN to mandate actions by other Departments of our Government, incuding The Supreme Court?

You mean that gang of oligarchs will craft a Constitutional response that holds "shall not be infringed." will not be restricted to government use only?

I won't hold my breath !!

[Blood of Tyrants]

I hope they go further than to just rule that you have a right to keep a firearm in your home. To rule so narrowly would be to ignore the part that says we can keep AND bear arms.

[ExSoldier]

It’s about time that we get this issue resolved.

I dunno. I'd like a nice conservative zone for something as important as this. One more of the Lib judges to quietly retire and for us to get one more conservative. Just in case one of our wishy washy Justices goes a little bit south, Kennedy has been known to swing to the left and Souter clearly is a Leftie although he was sold as the opposite. I'd really like to see Ruth depart the High Court.

[El Gato]

It’s about time that we get this issue resolved.

Don't count on it. The Supremes have a long history of ducking the issue.

They might use that request for a 30 day extension as their excuse to do nothing.

[supercat]

It’s about time that we get this issue resolved.

Is there any reason to expect the Supreme Court to do anything other than write a very narrow decision dealing with some very specific details of the case at hand? My expectation would be that the Supreme Court will provide that DC must acknowledge the application of the plaintiff who had applied for a permit and was denied, but will find that the other plaintiffs lack standing.