[El Gato]

Ultimately, we need a case that challenges Miller, which was argued and decided with only one side testifying

I'd put it a bit differently. We need a case that completes Miller. The basic ruling in Miller was that short barreled shotguns could be taxed, and effectively banned, unless evidence was produced showing they had usefulness in a military/militia context. They do of course, as do machine guns, "sniper rifles"(including the big .50 BMG version), semiautomatic handguns, true battle rifles and real assault rifles.

Never mind other interesting sorts of arms.

[ctdonath2]

I believe such a case will follow closely upon resolution of Parker - regardless of outcome. A strong case can be made; we just need SCOTUS to specify the starting point.

[the gillman@blacklagoon.com]

A prohibitive ruling by the SCOTUS would provide ample opportunity for citizens to demonstrate the military expediency of the short barreled shotgun.