[MileHi]

By "other courts" you're of course referring to the First, Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuit Courts, all ruling in dozens of cases that the second amendment does not protect an individual right. And the Fifth Circuit overturned no law.

So it's 11-1 against.

Imagine, you trolling here again. As expected. I see you have been ignored so far, good.

I have posted this to you before, and since you are so damn tiresome, I'll post it again, and you will ignore it again. Your 11-1 is based on one lie resting on another. "Precedent", yes. Honest jurisprudence, no. In fact you never address the racist roots of gun control in the US. Before they tried to keep "negros" from having guns, no one questioned the right of citizens (the "people", 'member?) to own and carry guns.

http://www.constitution.org/2ll/schol/gun_control_dencite.htm

Keep pounding away though.

[ctdonath2]

Keep pounding away though.

Please, not on this thread. (Surely I need not elaborate.)

[robertpaulsen]

"Imagine, you trolling here again."

Trolling? You mean supplying facts that run counter to your ignorant beliefs? Not my definition of "trolling". I call it "debating".

"Precedent", yes. Honest jurisprudence, no."

Ah. Now I get it. You're looking for an activist U.S. Supreme Court that will ignore 100 years of precedent and rule "honestly" (the definition of "honestly" being the way MileHi would rule if he sat on the court).

Hey, that's certainly possible. We can only hope they do. Because if they rule on that biased and racist precedent, we are screwed, blued, and tattooed.

We are not ready for this to go to the U.S. Supreme Court.

[EdReform]

Excellent link - thanks for posting it.