Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RC2

The question at hand IS “in the home”. It hasn’t “been that way” in DC for 30 years.

“On the streets” will come later.


10 posted on 07/16/2007 8:15:49 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (The color blue tastes like the square root of 0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2
The question at hand IS “in the home”. It hasn’t “been that way” in DC for 30 years.

Actually the first question is "is it an individual right", then comes the extent of the right.

It's hard to fathom that if the court rules that the right is individual that it can be limited to "in the home". Not allowing bearing outside the home would certainly be an infringement on the right to bear arms, as not allowing them in the home is an infringement on the right to keep arms. Now they might rule that regulation of the manner of bearing is OK, and thus requiring permist for concealed carry is OK, but open carry cannot be prohibited, at least in public places.

195 posted on 07/16/2007 8:14:15 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson