Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Roberts has not held up his end
The Kansas City Star ^ | 07/01/2007

Posted on 07/02/2007 1:27:02 AM PDT by Baladas

U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts pledged in his confirmation hearing to seek agreement among the Supreme Court's nine justices.

And like President Bush's second nominee to the court, Samuel Alito, Roberts said he would respect legal precedents set by previous courts.

So much for confirmation promises.

As it wraps up its second term, the Roberts court is sharply divided, with justices on the losing end of a string of 5-4 rulings expressing their frustrations from the bench.

Roberts, Alito and their conservative brethren have overturned legal precedents without so much as an explanation.

The result, made clear in rulings handed down this week and earlier, is empowerment for the powerful and callousness toward individuals.

The session will be remembered for a ruling that allows politicians, rather than women and physicians, to say whether a particular form of late-term abortion is appropriate.

The court's session will likely be remembered at election time for a ruling this week that could open the door for unions, corporations and other interest groups to spend unlimited amounts of money on ads meant to influence voters but thinly disguised as pronouncements on "issues."

Framed by Roberts as a victory for free speech, the ruling is a ticket for monied interests to drown out the voices of individuals and groups that heed campaign financing limits.

The court showed its disregard for fairness with 5-4 rulings that:

Made it much more difficult for women to sue employers for past pay discrimination.

Made it easier for prosecutors to choose juries predisposed to death sentences.

Said a missed deadline prohibited an Ohio inmate from reopening an appeal, even though a judge had given the inmate the wrong date.

The session was notable for questionable rulings that overturned established precedent.

The denial of the inmate's right to appeal flew in the face of a 45-year-old doctrine excusing people who missed court deadlines because of "unique circumstances."

And the campaign finance decision ignored a 2003 ruling, which recognized that some "issue ads" are campaign ads in disguise.

Changing times and attitudes can sometimes warrant breaking new legal ground. But respect for legal consistency demands an explanation from justices who abandon precedent. This court, in some important cases, failed to provide these explanations.

It comes as no surprise that Bush's justices have pointed the Supreme Court in a more conservative direction.

But Americans have a right to expect their highest court to rule on the basis of reason and fairness, not simply the muscle of a new majority.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: drivebymedia; justticeroberts; kansascitystar; liberalism; msm; robertscourt; scotus; tempertantrum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
I still have no idea what his "end" means in this context...did they really think he'd deliver only 9-0 decisions?

The Chief Justice seems to be coming the latest whipping boy for the MSM and their ilk.

McCain-Feingold, gut it. The MSM had better get used to alot of 5-4 decisions that they'll be on the losing side of.

1 posted on 07/02/2007 1:27:06 AM PDT by Baladas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Baladas
But Americans have a right to expect their highest court to rule on the basis of reason and fairness, not simply the muscle of a new majority.

I wonder... what does the KC Star consider "fair and reasonable" about partial birth abortion?

2 posted on 07/02/2007 1:30:30 AM PDT by Lexinom (http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

What a bunch of whiners.

Screw the KCStar!


3 posted on 07/02/2007 1:35:49 AM PDT by Mobile Vulgus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexinom

“I wonder... what does the KC Star consider “fair and reasonable” about partial birth abortion?”

They apparently don’t pay attention to the homicide that occurs when it happens......


4 posted on 07/02/2007 1:36:41 AM PDT by wk4bush2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
The MSM wants the Supreme Court to decide on the basis of liberal ideology, not the law. No wonder they're throwing a temper tantrum now that it hasn't happened.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

5 posted on 07/02/2007 1:38:16 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
The Chief Justice seems to be coming the latest whipping boy for the MSM and their ilk.

They're going to try and stir up the left for the 2008 election by claiming that conservative judges are ruining the country.

The next president will be able to "solve" this problem, since there are likely to be vacancies to fill.

6 posted on 07/02/2007 1:39:00 AM PDT by Schnucki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
unions, corporations and other interest groups

Interest groups? You mean when people with common interests get together and pool their resources to let their voices be heard?

Horror of horrors! Don't they know that's a right only for the liberal PRESS?!

7 posted on 07/02/2007 1:39:13 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Bostonian, atheist, prolifer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
The reason the MSM defended McCain-Feingold is it restored to them their monopoly "gatekeeper" status. They're angry a level playing field was brought back. How dare, how dare those peasants present their viewpoint!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

8 posted on 07/02/2007 1:41:59 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Cry me a river liberals.....


9 posted on 07/02/2007 1:42:36 AM PDT by Rick_Michael (Fred Thompson....IMWITHFRED.COM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
The Kansas City Star is a crybaby. I never heard them whining when a 5-4 decision went the liberals’ way. I’ll be happy when these liberal dinosaur newspapers are dead.

I get almost all my news from the internet. I’ve stopped watching FNC because of the way they characterized (and still characterize) the illegal immigration debate as racist. I was watching today when Juan-what’s-his-name and Mara-what’s-her-name on Brit Hume called the opponents racists and no one challenged them. Right after that I programmed FNC off my remote.

10 posted on 07/02/2007 1:49:09 AM PDT by de meanr (No Amnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Since he’s not to the Left of Souter, he’s Pure Evil.


11 posted on 07/02/2007 1:51:07 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudi: tough on terror, scared of Iowa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

This is what is called “political pressure on the court.”

Conservatives would do well to remember that they ARE susceptible to it.


12 posted on 07/02/2007 1:54:24 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Democrats are the Evil Party, Republicans are the Stupid Party - So, "Bipartisan"=Stupid AND Evil!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Once again it's a case of a newspaper condemning a conservative for just BEING a conservative. A liberal making liberal decisions--i.e. the exact opposite of Roberts'--the same editorialists would be praising her. And that's FINE--they have every right to approve of such judicial choices.

But here, once again, we see a paper saying that just by making conservative choices, a judge is "out of control" instead of just having the guts to say "We're liberal so we don't like these choices, though of course he had every right to make them."

13 posted on 07/02/2007 1:54:24 AM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Bostonian, atheist, prolifer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Where is the BARF Alert ???


14 posted on 07/02/2007 1:54:57 AM PDT by RachelFaith (Doing NOTHING... about the illegals already here IS Amnesty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

Even though Bush has gone off the deep end with the illegal immigration problem, I am glad that he got both Alito and Roberts in the court. Both are young, and both are conservative.


15 posted on 07/02/2007 2:26:49 AM PDT by gop4lyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas
"justices on the losing end of a string of 5-4 rulings expressing their frustrations"

OOooohhh, the poor babies. The best thing they can do to ease their frustrations is to resign, since none of them seems to want to die.

16 posted on 07/02/2007 2:30:30 AM PDT by Past Your Eyes (Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

This article misrepresented every case.


17 posted on 07/02/2007 2:53:29 AM PDT by GovernmentIsTheProblem (The GOP is "Whig"ing out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

How can one argue that he hasn’t sought agreement? He has found it with four other members, but failed to find it with the others. So be it. The objective of the court is to interpret the constitution as opposed to solving societal problems as claimed by the dems during his hearing.


18 posted on 07/02/2007 2:54:52 AM PDT by Upbeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baladas

The only way for lowly citizens to engage in this “so-called” speech about candidates is to pool their resources to buy time on issues relevant to them.

McCain-Feingold made that illegal.

It silenced the small guy.

Has anyone noticed George Soros and his ilk being silenced? Hardly.


19 posted on 07/02/2007 3:20:20 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Conservatives would do well to remember that they ARE susceptible to it.

Yes, and you know they've rolled over when the MSM refers their "growing" in office.

20 posted on 07/02/2007 3:36:58 AM PDT by GATOR NAVY (Hey! Must be a devil between us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson