Who would want to kill a journalist? (slightly sarcastic)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: period end of story
I’m sorry, you made it seem like a bad thing...
59 posted on
06/30/2007 8:59:39 AM PDT by
Dick Vomer
(liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
To: period end of story
What would we do without our Brave Journalists who risk life and limb to bring us reports of the murder and mayhem caused by Bushco and our Troops out of control in Middle East and elsewhere?
SUPPORT OUR JOURNALISTS. BRING THEM HOME NOW!
okay, sarcasm off, return to your normal everyday activities
60 posted on
06/30/2007 9:01:35 AM PDT by
DakotaRed
(Liberals don't rattle sabers, they wave white flags)
To: period end of story
[.. 100 journalists killed so far this year ..]
Well.... thats a good start..
69 posted on
06/30/2007 11:00:11 AM PDT by
hosepipe
(CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
To: period end of story
I am surprised that they could even find 100 “Journalists” in 2007.
73 posted on
06/30/2007 3:47:10 PM PDT by
Radix
(The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race)
To: period end of story
J school graduates are hardly “journalists”.
84 posted on
06/30/2007 7:53:41 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
(We all need someone we can bleed on...)
72 of these 100 were slain, and I think Lekic is right to point out that this increasing trend-if it is a trend-of journalists being marked for death is, at least, somewhat troubling.
As for the traitorous journalist scumbags: have at ‘em.
104 posted on
07/01/2007 5:07:34 AM PDT by
period end of story
(You can't fight in here...this is the War Room!!)
To: period end of story
I can think of a few that needs to be turned out to pasture here in the United states of America.
Turned out not under.
Somehow I just do not have as much sadness in my heart for reporters as I do for the deaths of our young military.
Hey you liberal anti-American hating MSM, how about a little support for your own country.
108 posted on
07/01/2007 5:46:26 AM PDT by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
To: period end of story
A neutral, blank slate, reaction to this is that war reporting is dangerous. That seems pretty obvious, and has no ideological implication.
But I think all parties have a slant. Liberals, to include many liberal journalists, place blame on the United States. They always do. That is their MO. That is not the way I see it, of course.
I think the terrorists and many journalists share anti-americanism and have a common antipathy to the American soldier. But journalists should remember that, despite the important values they may have in common with Muslim terrorists, they are still infidels to some of the people that they care most deeply about.
112 posted on
07/01/2007 7:14:15 AM PDT by
ChessExpert
(Reagan defeated the Russian communist empire despite the news industry and the Democratic party)
To: period end of story
118 posted on
07/01/2007 7:47:39 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: period end of story
I guess that means there are 87 less Liberals in the world today.
119 posted on
07/01/2007 7:49:55 AM PDT by
rock58seg
(Change Homeland Security to U. S. Security. It's time they remember what country to protect.)
To: period end of story
100 journalists killed so far this year
Well, that's a good start.
130 posted on
07/02/2007 10:18:36 PM PDT by
no dems
(The only way to stop the Fairness Doctrine: Elect a President in '08 who would veto it.)
To: period end of story
If a journalist is killed by a terrorist does he get 72 virgins??
Pray for W and Our Troops
131 posted on
07/02/2007 10:23:21 PM PDT by
bray
(Member of the FR President Bush underground)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson