Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Voters Strongly Pro-Life on Abortion, 35% Would Only Vote Pro-Life
Life News ^ | 6/28/07 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 06/28/2007 4:08:43 PM PDT by wagglebee

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- A new poll shows that an overwhelming majority of Republican voters are still strongly pro-life on the issue of abortion and see it as a reason for being a member of the party. The poll also found a sizable number of Republicans who say they would not likely vote for a pro-abortion Republican candidate.

The Republican-leaning Fabrizio-Mclaughlin polling firm surveyed 2000 self-identified GOP voters nationwide from May 28 to June 3.

The poll found that GOP voters are becoming more conservative with those using that label to identify themselves moving up to 71 percent form 55 percent. Moderates dropped 10 percent to 21 percent of all GOPers and liberal Republicans make up only four percent of the party.

When it comes to their views directly on the issue, the survey found 28 percent of Republicans say abortion should be illegal under any circumstances. Only 16 percent of GOP voters say abortion should always be legal.

Another 52 percent of Republican voters say abortion should only be allowed in "certain circumstances," although the poll didn't say what situations are included in the vague question.

Typically a sizable portion of those in the middle category favor keeping abortions legal in cases of rape or incest or to save the life of the mother -- which constitute less than two percent of all abortions, according to the pro-abortion Alan Guttmacher Institute.

As a result, about 80 percent of Republican voters want all abortions to be illegal or abortions to be legal in a rare handful of cases.

Another question in the poll asked the GOP voters to identify themselves as "pro-life" or "pro-choice," and 61 percent of Republicans say they are pro-life while just 34 percent said they're not.

The poll also found that a large block of 35 percent of Republicans would be unlikely to vote for a presidential candidate who agreed with them on other issues but disagreed with them on abortion.

The result is very significant for former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani, who is the top pro-abortion candidate seeking the GOP nod.

The survey shows that more than one-third of Republican voters won't consider him for president, which severely limits his ability to capture the nomination. Should he win the nod for the general election, the poll makes it appear he could have difficulty winning because he would lose such a substantial part of the Republican base.

When looking at why members of the party are Republicans, the abortion issue plays a strong role.

Some 7 percent of Republicans say they are members of the GOP specifically because of its pro-life stance on abortion.

But another 26 percent cite the party's conservative views, 22 percent say they have similar beliefs as the party, 13 percent cite moral or religious issues, and 19 percent said they were raised Republican or favor candidates of the party.

While not directly related to abortion, pro-life views play a role in each of the categories.

When asked what issue best defines the Republican Party, abortion came in third with 8 percent saying it primarily separates the GOP from the Democratic Party. Another 11 percent cited family values or moral issues, which can include abortion.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; abortion; elections; giuliani; gop; goppolls; poll; prolife; prolifevote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
The result is very significant for former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani, who is the top pro-abortion candidate seeking the GOP nod.

The survey shows that more than one-third of Republican voters won't consider him for president, which severely limits his ability to capture the nomination. Should he win the nod for the general election, the poll makes it appear he could have difficulty winning because he would lose such a substantial part of the Republican base.

Translation: It is IMPOSSIBLE for Roody to win the general election if he is the nominee.

1 posted on 06/28/2007 4:08:44 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 06/28/2007 4:09:14 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; NapkinUser; Reagan Man; Jim Robinson

Stop Rudy Ping


3 posted on 06/28/2007 4:09:48 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Rudy the abortionist going down in flames bump!!


4 posted on 06/28/2007 4:11:38 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

This is the same polling outfit that said the Republican Party is strongly pro-gay (after being funded by Log Cabin)

Not making any judgments, just that polls paid for by groups are not necessarily worth much of anything.


5 posted on 06/28/2007 4:14:15 PM PDT by xDGx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xDGx

Let me guess, you joined FR this week to push Roody.


6 posted on 06/28/2007 4:21:38 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Nope. I wouldn’t vote for Rudy at all (for other reasons)

Just pointing out that the research firm was the same that did a study which was clearly biased.

This is the firm: http://www.fabmac.com/staff.html

And their clients include the US Chamber of Commerce (who was a primary driving force behind the amnesty debacle)

I’m all for good data, but to be honest, a lot of the stuff these polling firms turn out is tailored to fit the goals of the folks who hire them. Just a friendly advisory to take all such data with a grain of salt.

Fair enough?


7 posted on 06/28/2007 4:32:17 PM PDT by xDGx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xDGx

Clarification: The firm did ANOTHER study for a different group which was clearly biased.


8 posted on 06/28/2007 4:33:22 PM PDT by xDGx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
>>>>>The survey shows that more than one-third of Republican voters won't consider him for president, which severely limits his ability to capture the nomination.

Just what many FReepers have been posting for quite some time. Not hard to figure out, unless you're a Rockefeller Republican pushing Rooty Toot. The base of the GOP remains a majority of pro-life conservatives and that is bad news for liberals like Giuliani.

9 posted on 06/28/2007 4:34:30 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xDGx

Here are other polling companies that reached the same conclusions:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1841238/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1856155/posts


10 posted on 06/28/2007 4:50:42 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

11 posted on 06/28/2007 4:54:09 PM PDT by WalterSkinner ( In Memory of My Father--WWII Vet and Patriot 1926-2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I’m pro-life and will never vote for a pro-abortion candidate, no matter who they are.


12 posted on 06/28/2007 4:54:34 PM PDT by Cedar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Ah, yes, but there are some people that are already looking forward to blaming the malcontent pro-lifers for ot selling out with a Rudy loss. Even though we’ve arned them it will happen. What they are really unhappy isn’t a Republican losing, but their liberal agenda losing.


13 posted on 06/28/2007 5:42:14 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (MR. BUSH: GET OUT OF REAGAN'S HOUSE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
What they are really unhappy isn’t a Republican losing, but their liberal agenda losing.

Yep, other than the fact that most of them hate the Clintons, they would be much happier as 'Rats.

14 posted on 06/28/2007 5:44:10 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cedar

I’m pro-life and will never vote for a pro-abortion candidate, no matter who they are.
____________________________
Ditto ..... Yes, it most certainly is my LITMUS TEST!


15 posted on 06/28/2007 6:20:38 PM PDT by cowdog77 (" Are there any brave men left in Washington, or are they all cowards?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...

.


16 posted on 06/28/2007 8:17:27 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, insects)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; wagglebee; Coleus
Or, to be more specific:

When looking at why members of the party are Republicans, the abortion issue plays a strong role.

Some 7 percent of Republicans say they are members of the GOP specifically because of its pro-life stance on abortion.

But another 26 percent cite the party's conservative views, 22 percent say they have similar beliefs as the party, 13 percent cite moral or religious issues, and 19 percent said they were raised Republican or favor candidates of the party.

While not directly related to abortion, pro-life views play a role in each of the categories.

When asked what issue best defines the Republican Party, abortion came in third with 8 percent saying it primarily separates the GOP from the Democratic Party. Another 11 percent cited family values or moral issues, which can include abortion.

17 posted on 06/28/2007 8:36:30 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://ccgoporg.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: xDGx

Prehaps, but the poll result itself is like reporting that bears poop in the woods. We already knew a lot of Republicans are pro-life. What is that news?


18 posted on 06/28/2007 10:19:31 PM PDT by Lexinom (http://www.gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
The Single Issue Litmus Test Republicans or SILT Republicans have decided to dominate the party as usual; however, this time the battle will be more intense and disagreeable.

The SILT Republicans will have to decide they are no longer playing by the rules, take their ball, go home and start a third party.

If a single issue determines a party's candidate choice, then the RINO Republican contingent has nothing to lose by standing their ground, supporting their candidates and seeing what happens. No more fear and trembling before the SILTs. I have had enough! I think others have as well, but only an election or two will tell.

19 posted on 10/04/2007 10:02:28 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shrinkermd; cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser; Mr. Silverback; MHGinTN; Liz; ...
The Single Issue Litmus Test Republicans or SILT Republicans have decided to dominate the party as usual; however, this time the battle will be more intense and disagreeable.

I have no idea what you mean, pro-life is simply ONE part of the conservative platform, but it is an essential one.

The SILT Republicans will have to decide they are no longer playing by the rules, take their ball, go home and start a third party.

Really? What is the name of this third party? Who is the nominee? Surely you aren't referring to Rooty Toot's friend Bloomberg.

If a single issue determines a party's candidate choice, then the RINO Republican contingent has nothing to lose by standing their ground, supporting their candidates and seeing what happens. No more fear and trembling before the SILTs. I have had enough! I think others have as well, but only an election or two will tell.

Well, I've got to hand it to you and the other Rooty Rooter FRiberals, you've tried your damnedest to make sure that the GOP is just as liberal as the 'Rats. But hey, if you've "had enough" then maybe it's time you came out of the closet that you were never really in. You and your ilk are the ENEMY of conservatives and your insidious nature has damaged the GOP more than the 'Rats have -- I'm glad you're finally out in the open exposed for what you really are.

20 posted on 10/04/2007 11:01:26 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson