You talk of a “Pre-Roe” timeframe but still live in it yourself. The law has already determined a fetus to not be a “person” therefore has no rights. This is not my personal belief however the “life,liberty,and pusuit of happiness” doesn’t apply to a “fetus.” So what were you saying about the abrogation of individuals or states?
That's the silly notion propated by Roe.
First, if you claim that any State has the right to declare the non-personhood of the "fetus," which simply means "child," you are agreeing with Roe, and have removed any moral or intellectual argument against Roe.
Secondly, if you take such a position, you have also removed any justification for any individual State to outlaw abortion.
In short, you are advocating for the status quo, as is any politician who takes this immoral and nonsensical position.