Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver

What is this guy smoking?


4 posted on 06/12/2007 4:26:19 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz
What is this guy smoking?

He's just one of those people who has to be first in line, if you catch my drift.. :-)

6 posted on 06/12/2007 4:28:50 AM PDT by Gorzaloon (Global Warming: A New Kind Of Scientology for the Rest Of Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gabz
What is this guy smoking?

I'm guessing he smokes those Clove fags.

48 posted on 06/12/2007 5:29:00 AM PDT by subterfuge (Today, Tolerance =greatest virtue;Hypocrisy=worst character defect; Discrimination =worst atrocity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gabz

Gabz, an honest lib, one of the very few, we ought to encourage this. He admits to the decades-long effort to deny that the 2nd Amendment means what it says. I’m all for honest debates.


66 posted on 06/12/2007 6:16:00 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (Jabba the Hutt's bigger, meaner, uglier brother.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gabz
What is this guy smoking?

Maybe he's just been reading some of George Will's old writings:

"Whatever right the Second Amendment protects is not as important as it was 200 years ago... The government should deconstitutionalize the subject by repealing the embarrasing Amendment." - George Will

Chickensh/t statists will always be with us.

117 posted on 06/12/2007 9:22:57 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gabz

>>What is this guy smoking?<<

There is a certain honesty here. When our fundamental rights are taken away it would be nice if they went through the motions of admitted we had those rights and actually changing the constitution instead of a judge just deciding we never had them in the first place, no matter what the constitution says.


118 posted on 06/12/2007 9:23:11 AM PDT by gondramB (Do not do to others as you would not wish done to yourself. Thus no murmuring will rise against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Gabz

I don’t think that he is smoking anything, given that he for the most part hits the facts on the head. He is correct and honest that the 2nd is an individual right, that gun control laws could (more correctly, should) be considered unconstitutional and that it is meant to protect against the federal government (among other threats). I don’t know if he dillousional or what when he states that we are much more ambivalent about gun ownership or that we no longer believe that we must protect against the federal government.


129 posted on 06/12/2007 9:59:22 AM PDT by looscnnn ("Those 1s and 0s you stepped in is a memory dump. Please clean your shoes." PC Confusious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson