Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gridlock
I see you are using the weasel words "entered this country".

"Weasel words"? They're ONLY the words defining this debate.

26 posted on 06/07/2007 7:41:45 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Jorge
"Weasel words"? They're ONLY the words defining this debate.

The way they entered this country does not define their legal status on the day they flew those airplanes into those buildings. Your argument is like saying that Ted Bundy should have been set free because back when he was in the Sixth Grade, he hadn't killed anybody yet.

Repeatedly talking about the way an illegal immigrant entered the country instead of acknowledging the fact that he is illegal regardless of how he entered the country is weasely. And you are continuing to do so, even after your error has been pointed out to you many times.

Now, go ahead and tell me the entered the country legally again... That is not the point!

32 posted on 06/07/2007 7:46:46 PM PDT by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Jorge

“They’re ONLY the words defining this debate.”

No, the debate is about legal vs illegal status.

Those who don’t like the debate are trying to redefine it, but that will not work regarding people who break the law (illegal).


68 posted on 06/07/2007 8:18:10 PM PDT by mjaneangels@aolcom ("nor prohibiting the free exercise thereof.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson