[LS]

Agree that he should admit he was wrong. But in theory, we could survive 20-30 years of “open borders.” We won’t survive 10 of al-quaeda if they get bombs. So WoT is by far #1 to me.

[chesley]

Well, it might be more urgent, but I don’t think it’s as important. Not to downplay it’s importance, but we can lose in Iraq and survive, although the following years will be difficult.

With a vast population of people who have not subscribed to American values influencing the direction of the country, I don’t think we will survive.

That’s just the way I see it. I could be wrong, but I don’t think so.

Anyway, Rudy and McCain are strong on the WOT, but not much else. Those that are good on other issues are also strong on the WOT, so why settle?

Finally, if the American people DO elect Hillary, or some other Dem, then perhaps our time has past.

[nygoose]

But in theory, we could survive 20-30 years of “open borders.”

I don't think your thesis is correct.

[Tammy8]

But in theory, we could survive 20-30 years of “open borders.”

Even if that were true, we have already had many years of little or no enforcement- meaning we have had many years of open borders. Not to mention open borders is an open invitation to terrorists, so it should be a primary concern to anyone interested in the War on Terror.