Posted on 06/01/2007 6:40:07 PM PDT by AVNevis
Do you think efforts to save endangered fish are worthy of jeopardizing the state's water supply?
as of now
Do you think efforts to save endangered fish are worthy of jeopardizing the state’s water supply?
Choice Votes Percentage of 157 Votes
Yes 68 43%
No 89 57%
Do I put yes or no ?
This needs to go down hard. It may seem silly, but KCRA flashes this poll on TV every 15 minutes or so during their news. If DWR sees it is going down hard, they may see that the public doesn’t want them cutting off water to 25 million people to save a fish.
Scary that 39% think it’s ok to endanger the water supply. Proof the world has gone eco insane.
Definatly
No 64% Yes 36%
Absolutely.
No smelt = no salmon
no salmon = no salmon eggs
no salmon eggs = no REAL trout fishing
no REAL trout fishing = end of Civilization As We Know It, water-flogging fly-”fishermen” to the contrary.
SAVE THE SMELT;
SAVE CIVILIZATION!
NO FISH-BLOOD FOR LAWNS!
Okay; that’s out of my system; it is now FReeped.
I have to wonder how much water would be saved, if all of California’s illegal aliens were removed from the equation? Gosh, that might even affect gas & electric supplies, too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.