“His voting record against illegal immigration is fairly strong, and he’s correct in pushing for border security first.”
I believe that someone else already posted Fred’s illegal immigration record, and it’s nothing for Fredbots to brag about.
“Funny, Duncan Hunter voted for the 527 bill, but I don’t see you making a big deal out of that.”
So Fred decides to vote for a bill that would take away our First Amendment rights(McCain-Feingold), and once it passed Duncan decided that he would vote to define it in a way that would hurt the Democrats. I don’t see anything wrong with that.
“For which Fred wrote a lengthy and substantive justification, after which I tended to agree with him - that article of impeachment was flawed. Fred did vote for the obstruction article.”
I have read his lengthy justification, and I don’t agree with it.
Before Fred Thompson decided to start his non-campaign, if you asked most conservatives “Do you think Clinton should have been convicted of perjury”, you would get a resounding “Yes”. But ever since the Fred craze, that has changed. If Fred Thompson supported Bill Clinton on that charge, then the Fredbots will do the same.
So much for your First Amendment absolutism, weasel-boy.