Thompson says deporting the illegal who are here is "unrealistic."
That disqualifies both of them.
So at the moment, Hunter looks like the only half-way viable candidate.
Duncan Hunter has been THE most effective candidate in securing our borders:
“Duncan Hunter originated the fence along the Mexico-U.S. border decades ago in order to cut down crime against illegal immigrants. Today, that fence (a double fence) is 14 miles long. It has cut smuggling (people and drugs) over 90% and has drastically reduced the 10/year murder rate of illegal immigrants by removing the mobility of the cross border criminal gangs. It has eliminated the major cross border drug automobile chases. The crime rate in San Diego as a whole is 44% as compared to the pre-fence crime rate. A large scale extension of the fence (700 miles long) was authorized in the 2006 bill “Secure Fence Act of 2006”. His efforts over some 20 plus years have brought the fence to be considered as a major instrument of immigration policy and border control.”
http://www.gohunter08.com/inner.asp?z=1
Good place to bump this thread. I hope Hunter gets some traction from this issue.
Tancredo/Hunter
or for you
Hunter/Tancredo
;-)
Wouldn’t that be a dream ticket?
You are mischaracterizing or misunderstanding Fred Thompson’s position on illegal immigration. He did say that deporting all of them is unrealistic, but that is hardly the end of his position.
He is for securing the border before we do anything. Then, he is for enforcing existing laws, so the illegals go home on their own. Turning the water off so to speak.
Your a liar too sooo theerrrree!
take that windbag....
Oh that felt sooooooo gooood
LOL