To: SuziQ
I have a hard time understanding the impetus behind someone who puts his acting career first. He should state he is running.
74 posted on
05/25/2007 12:12:56 AM PDT by
kinoxi
To: kinoxi
It is a matter of contract obligations. Certainly you can appreciate the fact he understands the “rule of law”.
75 posted on
05/25/2007 12:14:51 AM PDT by
gov_bean_ counter
( Who is the Democrat's George Galloway?)
To: kinoxi
It’s not acting, it’s sales and marketing.
77 posted on
05/25/2007 12:17:23 AM PDT by
jedward
(Mission '08 - Take back the House & Senate. No Negotiations...No Prisoners.)
To: kinoxi
“He should state he is running”
Why should he state that he is running?
83 posted on
05/25/2007 12:26:40 AM PDT by
jedward
(Mission '08 - Take back the House & Senate. No Negotiations...No Prisoners.)
To: kinoxi
Do you even understand Equal Time rules? I find them stupid myself, but that’s what is looming until his movie airs on Sunday. You’re digging yourself a hole. The first step, of course, is to stop digging.
87 posted on
05/25/2007 12:43:41 AM PDT by
FremontLives
(The eagle never lost so much time as when he submitted to learn from the crow.)
To: kinoxi
I have a hard time understanding the impetus behind someone who puts his acting career first. He should state he is running.I'm just thrilled that there is someone who has done something OTHER than politics who is interested in running for President. Makes for a much more interesting person.
I have no problem with someone being honest enough to finish one job, and fulfill his obligations, before he starts another.
91 posted on
05/25/2007 12:50:35 AM PDT by
SuziQ
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson