Posted on 05/19/2007 4:48:30 PM PDT by ER_in_OC,CA
Hell, half of Mexico lives there already.
As bad as this legislation looks on the surface, once you start reading the fine print it becomes even more radical than you imagined.
What in God's name is this administration thinking...?? Something is definately not right somewhere.
Actually, I think I agree with AmericanInTokyo.
“Yeah, the bill allows illegals to instantly become legal.
It allows them to stay that way indefinitely.
It even doesn’t even bother to pursue any back taxes they might owe, a luxury not afforded to citizen taxpayers.”
Yeah. Like as in, we don’t pay our back taxes - guess what. We can have gov lien agianst anything we own and - or - go to jail...
Aren't any more reasons that make any sense at all.
I just don’t know, FRiend. Dubya took office with economic ambitions (accomplished), but had some sort of Texas governor/thousand-points-of-light baggage with our southern border.
We’ll likely never know why such an American President with foreign policy vision (rightly or wrongly) was just all too happy to give up our physical sovereignty. I’m wondering if this is all just some sort of gamesmanship.
Just because we do not agree with something Bush has done does not mean we abandon him. We need to double the prayers for him to see the error of his ways.
What about it? Anyone else want to weigh in here?
I suppose it could have something to do with that new world order stuff, and the north american union. I knew this was a possibliity when I voted for him. I just did not think that the legislature would ever muster the support to pass it, and I really hoped Bush would temper the compassion with common sense.
Course it is not law yet. If we can not turn the tide on this lousy bill, then we are well and truly screwed.
We just have to keep the heat on. The MSM, of course, will flak for this stupid GOP equivalent of “Hillarycare” unless somehow Dubya gets credit for it.
Friday was a s**train at the Capitol Switchboard. It’s supposed to be voted on in the Senate on Wednesday. My guess is the House will kill it, but that’s no excuse for us.
Giving the Dems hell about it is actually kind of fun, since we can make the crocodile tears argument about the wages of “Working Families”. Cross-dressing can be beneficial at times!
;-)
LOL. Not only that we can weep bitterly because they are splitting up families and is it not all about the CHILDREN????? Why where in the world is the “village” that it would allow them to do this?
Damned straight/Spot On. Giving a (gasp) MALE wage-earner equal opportunity not only discriminates against the distaff workforce, but the surge of workers no doubt prevents the “oppressed” class from seeking publically-supported “reproductive rights” funding.
We could tie this up for years!
[and take it easy on AIT, he’s a good one.]
LOL. We surely could tie it up for years. I didn’t mean to be hard on AIT, just can’t resist toning down what sounds to me like a little hyperbole.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.