Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Menu Foods Says It's Ready to Process Claims from Pet Owners (Must Read for Pet Owners)
Consumer Affairs.com ^ | May 17, 2007 | Lisa Wade McCormick

Posted on 05/19/2007 10:53:22 AM PDT by greyfoxx39

Menu Foods has posted claims information on its Web site for pet owners whose pets were killed or injured by contaminated feed.

The Canadian-based company in March recalled more than 60 million containers of melamine-tainted pet food -- linked to the deaths and illnesses of thousands of dogs and cats nationwide -- and now says it will “address any reasonable expense incurred by pet owners that we can identify as being caused by contamination of Menu Foods’ products.”

The company also advised pet owners of the ramifications of settling directly with Menu Foods instead of joining one of the more than 50 class-action lawsuits filed in the United States and Canada.

-snip-

The company requires them to file the following documentation, which many pet owners may not have:

• Receipts from the purchase of the affected products;
• Copies of any labels from the products;
• Copies of any records from a veterinarian, clinic or other healthcare facility;

(Excerpt) Read more at consumeraffairs.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catfood; dogfood; menufoods; petfoodrecall; recall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
From the "hurdles" erected before any claim can be considered, and the "ramifications" threatened for a class action suit, I doubt many pet owners will be able to receive any kind of settlement.

Disclaimer: It may be O.K. to post the entire article here, but I like to give the web site the hits. The whole article is worth reading.

1 posted on 05/19/2007 10:53:25 AM PDT by greyfoxx39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn; mom4kittys; blam; Salamander; Red Badger; WakeUpAndVote; dirtboy; Overtaxed; ...

Ping


2 posted on 05/19/2007 10:54:22 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Thanks congress and Presidente Bush, I'm feeling very non-multi-culti today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
More from the article: "Pet owners are also asked to save all opened and unopened cans and pouches of the affected dog and cat foods.

In addition, pet owners must fill out a lengthy questionnaire that asks for such information as the UPC codes on the recalled foods, dates the products were manufactured, dates when their pets ate the food, number of cans or pouches their pets ate, and whether their pets had any pre-existing conditions.

3 posted on 05/19/2007 10:56:01 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Thanks congress and Presidente Bush, I'm feeling very non-multi-culti today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; mom4kittys; LucyT

Thanks for posting.


4 posted on 05/19/2007 10:58:01 AM PDT by sweetiepiezer (Pray for W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sweetiepiezer

You’re welcome...I searched and didn’t find it had been posted earlier.


5 posted on 05/19/2007 11:01:56 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Thanks congress and Presidente Bush, I'm feeling very non-multi-culti today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Seems a little crazy to me. If you fed your dog the “bad” food, and a week later ended up with a very sick dog, I’m sure you don’t have the labels from the affected food or a receipt for the purchased food.

They’re not doing themselves any favor by requiring this strict of documentation. The vet’s reports, i.e. treatment, cause of illness, etc, should be enough.


6 posted on 05/19/2007 11:02:56 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
From the "hurdles" erected before any claim can be considered, and the "ramifications" threatened for a class action suit, I doubt many pet owners will be able to receive any kind of settlement.

Very bad PR move by the company. It would be cheaper to pay vet bills plus five grand for ANY pet that showed symptoms consistent with the problem than to face the inevitable class-action suit that will stem from this approach.

7 posted on 05/19/2007 11:04:51 AM PDT by dirtboy (A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
They’re not doing themselves any favor by requiring this strict of documentation. The vet’s reports, i.e. treatment, cause of illness, etc, should be enough.

IIRC, during the time that this was hitting all the news sources, they said time and again that they would "make things right" or words to that effect.

8 posted on 05/19/2007 11:06:03 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Thanks congress and Presidente Bush, I'm feeling very non-multi-culti today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
My animals get Iams and Science Diet.

I will write both companies and demand they do not use Menu Foods after this ham-handed approach to dealing with the impact.

9 posted on 05/19/2007 11:06:03 AM PDT by dirtboy (A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

Sort of off topic but I happend to look at a back of Motts applejuice and it said it was made from concentrate out of the US, Argentina and China.

I think I’m going to start looking at each food item I purchase for descriptions like this. If they don’t have it, I’ll pass.


10 posted on 05/19/2007 11:12:09 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Say NO to an illegal amnesty!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Actually, the cheapest out for them would be a class action suit. The plaintiff’s lawyer would get a few million, the lead plaintiffs would get a few thousand, and the ordinary victims would get coupons for free pet food from Menu.

Given their restrictions on the current program, it appears that they have recognized the class action would be cheaper than processing claims.


11 posted on 05/19/2007 11:16:49 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

This is bullcrap! My dad had to put his 8-year-old white Persian to sleep because of kidney failure, probably after eat it some the poisoned food. Needless to say, he does not have his original receipt, or the packaging, or any pictures of the cat while it was wasting away (since neither he nor the vet knew what was happening at the time, at least until the news broke, and everything had been thrown away. Class action is the way to go on this, if for nothing else to drive Menu Foods into bankruptcy, which it and its suppliers richly deserve.


12 posted on 05/19/2007 11:20:15 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

I have a feeling a class-action suit would be a lot worse than that.


13 posted on 05/19/2007 11:20:16 AM PDT by dirtboy (A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

I don’t know about you, but I usually pitch the cans in the garbage or recycle bin after serving the pet food. As far as I know, our cat probably only got one can of the tainted food. She ate a little, and threw up on the dining room carpet.


14 posted on 05/19/2007 11:22:26 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

No, there are plaintiffs lawyers now who work with the companies. Generally, the lawyers and the lead plaintiffs are the only ones who get much out of the class action suits. The class members usually get hosed. Very few people bother to ‘opt out’.


15 posted on 05/19/2007 11:25:31 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

TANKS for the ping,,,I hope everybody goes with the class action suit,,,


16 posted on 05/19/2007 11:27:19 AM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
Class action is the way to go on this

It's more than likely a participant in a Class Action is going to maybe need more documentation, not less...otherwise, it's a toss out of court.

(kinda like those Chicago bus accidents where there are 3 passengers, but 45 witnesses in the 'hood end up claiming bad backs)

17 posted on 05/19/2007 11:31:27 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (...forward this to your 10 very best friends....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
That required documentation is a slap in the face to owners who lost their pets from this. My dogs had eaten Ol' Roy for years, and I had no reason to save all the receipts, much less the labels, and neither would anyone else during the time period the food was contaminated. I was fortunate that my dogs seem to be fine, but others unfortunately were not so lucky. Maybe the dry food which was the major part of their diet was the reason. Why on earth would they think people would be saving labels and receipts when they did not have a clue what was killing their pets? Dumb question. Of course they don't think that. What an insult.
18 posted on 05/19/2007 11:33:44 AM PDT by MagnoliaMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mom4kittys; HairOfTheDog; Slings and Arrows

ping


19 posted on 05/19/2007 11:38:06 AM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arizona Carolyn; mom4kittys; blam; Salamander; Red Badger; WakeUpAndVote; dirtboy; Overtaxed; ...

20 posted on 05/19/2007 11:44:53 AM PDT by mom4kittys (If velvet could sing, it would sound like Josh Groban)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson