Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
You missed the whole point of my question. I asked,

What difference would you have in evolution if life started 1) naturally, 2) seeded from outer space, or 3) by some divine intervention?

And this led you to debate the three choices.

The actual answer is that evolution could proceed as described with any of these three origins -- because evolution involves change, not origins.

FWIW, truly I miss many of the recently departed "evos" -- you must be feeling like the "Lone Ranger" around here lately. Some of those people are first-rate thinkers and they were wonderful "adversaries" in debate.

Its ironic that you miss some of the recently departed, as you and a number of others helped to run them off. You see mysticism and religious belief as equals with science; that might be acceptable in philosophy, but it doesn't cut it in science. But what was particularly galling was the number of times those supporting the theory of evolution were told by a few posters that they were going to hell, compared with Hitler and Stalin, or their years of study and research were denigrated on the basis of something quote mined from the web or lifted from some silly anti-science website like AnswersInGenesis. Then, a year or so ago when the admins and management started playing games and banning pro-science posters, many others took the hint and left. That is when Darwin Central was formed -- as a refuge.

Finally, I am certainly not feeling like the "Lone Ranger" (Hi Dave!). I have science on my side, so I have you outnumbered and outgunned! ;-)

39 posted on 05/19/2007 11:36:11 AM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman
"You missed the whole point of my question. I asked,

What difference would you have in evolution if life started 1) naturally, 2) seeded from outer space, or 3) by some divine intervention?

And this led you to debate the three choices.The actual answer is that evolution could proceed as described with any of these three origins -- because evolution involves change, not origins."

Which proves that 'evolution' means absolutely nothing at all. It's the old bait-and-switch routine played upon credulists. Nothing more.

48 posted on 05/19/2007 8:30:01 PM PDT by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman
I have science on my side, so I have you outnumbered and outgunned! ;-)

I just watched Monty Python and the Holy Grail tonight. I tend to doubt the outnumbered part.

Full Disclosure: ...very small rocks.

Cheers!

122 posted on 05/25/2007 10:14:26 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson