Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jwalsh07
Oh really?

Again, show me where the President has supported the destruction of human embryos, as Mitt Romney still does.

The reason I say that the President is harldy the lodestone is because he supports a rape and incest exception.

112 posted on 05/09/2007 8:18:17 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("A [Free] Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance
Preisdent Bush signed the legislation that made it lawful to use federal funds to research stem cell lines. Embryos were necessarily destroyed to get the stem cells. Both men oppose the use of federal funds to destroy nascent human life. Neither man has the power to forbid anybody to do just that where federal funds are not involved. That is, unfortunately the state of the law in America.

In fact neither man can stop an abortionist from killing a full term baby minutes before birth. That too is the unfortunate state of the law in America. We must have a pro life POTUS, that I am committed to, because we must make it unlawful to murder unborn babies. We can't get to protecting embryos until we can protect 8 month old babies. That is also the fact of the matter.

118 posted on 05/09/2007 8:28:27 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson