To: BurbankKarl
In L.A. Unified, for example, he concluded that only about 49% of the students who were enrolled as sophomores went on to graduate on time last yearBusiness as usual.
To: BurbankKarl
"We've constructed a system that sets in place incentives for disinformation," Is the LA Times referring to themselves?
3 posted on
05/08/2007 10:31:22 AM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(Truth is to Liberals what Kryptonite is to Superman)
To: BurbankKarl
“In L.A. Unified, for example, he concluded that only about 49% of the students who were enrolled as sophomores went on to graduate on time last year, while the rate was closer to 60% in previous years.”
My wife’s niece graduated just before these requirements. No way she would have ever passed one of these exams.
4 posted on
05/08/2007 10:34:43 AM PDT by
ColdWater
To: BurbankKarl
“The failure rate on the exam in these schools was sigificantly higher than at predominately white,affluent schools.These inequities have not been adequately addressed...”Translation:Mo money!
7 posted on
05/08/2007 10:41:26 AM PDT by
Thombo2
To: BurbankKarl
It took a UCLA study to find this?
Memo to the LAT: A decent newspaper should have questioned the reported improvement the day it was announced instead of sitting on its tush blaring that "spending more money works."
9 posted on
05/08/2007 11:01:37 AM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(Duncan Hunter for President)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson