Posted on 04/29/2007 2:02:24 PM PDT by jmq
Just happening at Ward parkway mall
How many of the victims are black?
Because the legislators wrote the law maybe.
Legislators have always written laws that exempt themselves from enforcement.
An easy way to spot a bad law is when legislators think it would be a bad idea if they had to follow it.
It is Democratic Policy that there are no non-victims.
(Except rich Republicans)
This shooting appears to have made Whoraldo Rivera’s day.
“Police received several c.....alls from people who saw a man with a “long gun” at the mall, Sanders said. The gunman shot two people in the parking lot, killing them, then went inside the mall and fired more shots, Sanders said.
The mall, one of the city’s busiest shopping centers, was shut down and officers were going through each store, Sanders said.
Preliminary witness accounts gave conflicting accounts of exactly where the shootings occurred. Television video showed a window shot out at a Starbucks coffee shot but some witnesses said the shooting occurred around a Target store.....
excerpt
http://www.kansas.com/197/story/57573.html
The problem comes if you ever need it and have to deal with the heat after the fact of breaking the law.
I emailed him with an appropriate response.
Some years ago we had an incident here in San Francisco where a fellow was riding his bicycle down Laguna St one evening. Three ‘yutes’ from a city down the peninsula tried to hijack him and knocked him down and off his bike. He came up blasting and ventilated 2 of them. Unfortunately it was only a .25cal and all 3 managed to get into their car and take off
As luck would have it though one of the ventilatees was driving and checked out wrecking the car. The cops arrived in due course to take reports and photos. The bicyclist had long took off on foot. The local PD tried for several weeks to have him come forward so they could just “talk” to him. He never did.
The up side was the 2 surviving “yutes” were sent to prison because of the fatality that occurred during the commission of a crime that they initiated. Ironically witnesses did say a 3rd party stole the bike before the cops arrived. The bicyclist apparently had no illusions about the DA’s office in San Francisco.
“Who cares if they allow it or not...good people need to have their weapons to deter mass shootings. No one’s going to prosecute a person who just saved of the lives of many possible victims.”
Yup...I’m so glad I live in Florida, where we have excellent “Castle Doctrine” laws that extend to “anywhere a person has a right to be”. Malls generally have signs that prohibit concealed weapons, but I ignore them. If my weapon is concealed, they will never know. If by some chance mall security notices I have a weapon, the most they can do is ask me to leave, and I would politely comply with that request. No need to bring unnecessary trouble on myself at that point.
I doubt it. It was probably an SKS. When dumb asses see them, they think they are AK-47s. It's the same situation with the AR-15, when some clueless person calls them M-16s.
Democrats will do anything to justify their agenda.
AFF Bump!
At least you’re alive to....
Gosh I love a story with a good ending....
Unlikely. He's still alive.
The Second Amendment could not be any clearer.
Henceforth, I will be carrying concealed in ALL public places.
All means all.
I reckon the gun grabbers know where they can put their un- constitutional laws.
CJ-50 wrote:
I don’t care what the sign on the door says,
If the owner of a business doesn’t want guns in their place, they can make that the policy and you can
take your money and go to an establishment that allows your weapon. I think that is the way it is
supposed to work.
Flat BS.
Public places cannot deny entrance to blacks, gays, a specific gender, etc, and they damn sure are not goign to discriminate against me for exercising my Constitutional right to defend myself.
If they spot my weapon and don’t like it, I will leave, and will never patronize their store again.
I will also dump a bucketload of cash into sueing them for discrimination.
I may not win, but they won’t get off scot free either.
If they don’t notice I’m carrying, TS.
As opposed to the unarmed suspect firing shots, or unarmed suspect not firing shots.
... Or a man with no arms trying to do shots...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.