Here's SF Newsom with the friend he later had arrested for "stalking":
You don’t think that Rudy is a gay rights activist?
http://www.stonewallvets.org/MayorRudy.htm
http://www.stonewallvets.org/RudyGiuliani.htm
Here's SF Newsom with the friend he later had arrested for "stalking":
At Stonewall Veterans Association meetings, I imagine the war stories usually include a discussion of hand lotions and matching accessories.
Please FReepmail me (ShorelineMike) to be added to, or removed from, the Caption-A-Rama PING list.
Also, please FReepmail me if you spot a juicy thread.
How many conservatives are rushing to support this degenerate.
I wonder where the gay guys plan to kiss me?
It looks like Rooty is giving the guy to his left, from the expression on his face, a `reach around’.
Isn’t New York like 20% gay? Its not likely a Pat Robertson candidate would win there.
Guy on Right: "FAAAAAAAABULOUS!"
“Kiss me Next, Rudy!”
Railroad spike in Rudy's coffin.
Well, gee, maybe we should elect a president who isn’t so friendly with gay people. That way, we can insure there won’t be any gay people in America by 2012.
Seriously, I just don’t see the logic here. This country has a few million gay people. It will have a few million gay people in 2012 regardless of who is president.
If people want to criticize a proposed Giuliani policy, that’s a fair ground for debate. If Giuliani has said he was going to use his presidency to campaign for gay marriage, for example, that’s a fair issue to discuss. But he hasn’t said that.
When people put up pictures like this, it seems that FR is descending into tribalism. People seem to be saying “we shouldn’t vote for Giuliani because he hangs out with gays and people like us don’t.” The issues are too important to descend into tribalism.
Obviously, we conservatives have legitimate reasons to criticize Giuliani on the issues. But when we criticize him based on old photos, we are not articulating a position based on an inssue.
MMMMM! Tastes like WAFFLES!