Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy
His own words betray him - after saying he would appoint strict constructionists, he re-defined the term to allow a strict constructionist to uphold Roe as precedent.

He accurately stated that he can't guarantee what a judge will do. History backs him up.

81 posted on 04/25/2007 10:36:46 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Cincinatus' Wife
He accurately stated that he can't guarantee what a judge will do. History backs him up.

No, he said a lot more than that. He allowed a strict constructionist to uphold Roe.

However, if a judge upheld Roe, he would no longer be a strict constructionist.

Rudy redifined the term to have no meaning.

Does Rudy-Aid impact your reading comprehension? This stuff has been gone over ad naseum, yet you keep spewing the same completely-discredit talking points. Is that all you have left?

83 posted on 04/25/2007 10:38:49 AM PDT by dirtboy (Duncan Hunter 08/But Fred would also be great)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson