Giuliani warns of 'new 9/11' if Dems win

The Politico ^ | 4/24/2007 | Roger Simon

[Andonius_99]

Pantyhose?

[Clemenza]

If Hillary wins, it wouldn't make much of a difference foreign policy-wise. We either have disaster on the installment plan via a control freak with a superficial understanding of the world (Rutard) or a control freak with a warped understanding of the world (Hillary).

In any event. Hillary would destroy Giuliani. Just as she would have stomped him like a stinkbug had he not pulled out of the Senate race due to ethical issues and prostate cancer.

[Gracey]

Great Post. Thanks for being brave enough, in this climate, to post it.

[muleskinner]

A pair of what?

If you have to ask, you’ve never had any.

[FreedomNeocon]

Becuase its the lowest of the low... attack his stance on gun control or abortion, that at least has some merit.

But replying with the same pics hoping to disgust someone at the lowest and cheapest of levels is pathetic, and you deserve any flames you get for it... though considering your response the very reason you posted was to 'get a rise' so I don't get why you're acting all pissy now.

[kinoxi]

Of course not.

[EternalVigilance]

Look, I can play the scorched earth game too like the rest of you SELFISH purists.

Yeah, I've seen several dozen folks who think like you here in the last couple of days. They're all FR ashes now...

[Graybeard58]

I like your posts. Keep up the good work.

[roses of sharon]

Taking it to the enemy, here and abroad, music to my ears!

[Paperdoll]

You can bet the DNC’s coffers are bulging with whatever coin the Muzzies use!

[Gracey]

You’re thinking smart. Don’t change. Keep thinking.... We love American and wish for it to continue as a FREE country, first and foremost.

[EternalVigilance]

I like your posts. Keep up the good work.

I'll second that.

[Kevmo]

I disagree. If rudy were pres, the terrorists would be pasting those kind of pictures all over the place in their subcultures. It is not the lowest of the low. It is a legitimate focus on someone who is not presidential material.

[gonewt]

In any event. Hillary would destroy Giuliani. Just as she would have stomped him like a stinkbug had he not pulled out of the Senate race due to ethical issues and prostate cancer.

I wholeheartedly disagree about the NY Senate race in 2000. Rudy would have mopped the floor with Hillary. He would have eaten into her base in the city and cleaned her clock upstate.

Lazio ran about the worst campaign I've ever seen and still kept it relatively close until the end.

[NapkinUser]

though considering your response the very reason you posted was to 'get a rise' so I don't get why you're acting all pissy now.

No it wasn't. I fully meant it. If it was posted to "get a rise" as your faulty reasoning claims, more people would have wrote something. But a whole two people responded, and only one whined about it, that one being your sorry as*. So you're really not one to talk about being "pissy".

[aligncare]

Rudy Giuliani is so pathetic. But, not nearly as pathetic as those mentally deficient Republicans, Southern conservatives and Christian conservatives that keep supporting his candidacy in poll, after poll, after poll, after national poll.

What dupes they are.

[EternalVigilance]

Rudy doesn't cut the mustard. At best, he should be made ambassador to Togo or Kazakhstan.

Whatcha got againt folks in those poor countries?

[Fishrrman]

From the article:
"The Democrats do not understand the full nature and scope of the terrorist war against us."

Giuliani said terrorists "hate us and not because of anything bad we have done; it has nothing to do with Israel and Palestine. They hate us for the freedoms we have and the freedoms we want to share with the world."

Giuliani continued: "The freedoms we have are in conflict with the perverted, maniacal interpretation of their religion." He said Americans would fight for "freedom for women, the freedom of elections, freedom of religion, and the freedom of our economy."

After his speech to the Rockingham County Lincoln Day Dinner, I asked him about his statements and Giuliani said flatly: "America will safer with a Republican president."

Here is someone who gets it.

Are the other candidates speaking as plainly?

Do all you Giulianni-haters really, _really_, REALLY believe there is NO DIFFERENCE between electing Giulianni and electing Hillary Clinton or B. Hussein Obama?

How much more does he need to say?

How much more could ANYone say?

- John

[FreedomNeocon]

Thats good... I hope you enjoy president Clinton the 2nd as much as you enjoy destroying our field of candidates.

[NapkinUser]

I like your posts. Keep up the good work.

Thanks, I wasn't expecting that. I'll try.