Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Just sayin
Personally, I would like to see a day come where a pregnancy can be removed from a female who does not wish to remain pregnant without ending the pregnancy itself.

Can you please explain to me how "a pregnancy can be removed from a female" "without ending the pregnancy itself"? I'm trying to figure out how a mother can be both pregnant and not pregnant at the same time. You terminated your mother's pregnancy - by being born. So what are you talking about? Was your mother's pregnancy "removed" from her "without ending her pregnancy?

You repeat mindless euphemisms and slogans, even to the point of making literally nonsense statements. Why?

You don't want to call a baby a baby. You call a preborn baby a "pregnancy", which from the baby's point of view, is an absurdity.

If you have to dress something up to cover up the truth of what's happening, it's probably a good idea to assume that there's something wrong with it.

Cordially,

4,951 posted on 04/23/2007 11:23:04 AM PDT by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4702 | View Replies ]


To: Diamond
Can you please explain to me how "a pregnancy can be removed from a female" "without ending the pregnancy itself"?

Similar to the way an organ is removed and implanted in another. Science and technology would have to make advances in this area as has been done up to this point to allow us to do what we do today.

You repeat mindless euphemisms and slogans, even to the point of making literally nonsense statements. Why?

Please do be specific with the so called slogans and nonsense statements. I will address them as you do so.

I call an unborn baby what it is truhfully...an unborn baby. There is something wrong with abortion, which is exactly why I seek to find another route. I guess that is beyond you. Please see that just removing choice because something is wrong doesn't solve everything, it only creates other problems. Like slippery slopes.

The liberal left points out what they feel is wrong all the time. Gun bans, Smoking bans, seat belts, helmets, etc etc etc. Their answer is just to ban something without any other solutions or choices. That tactic is opposed on this website and others as improper all the time. And rightly so.

I believe what sets a conservative apart from the liberal leftist is the ability to seek out solutions that solve problems, address wrongs, without using an adittional wrong to do it. That is what the left does and I want no part of such a tactic.

I do not believe that just banning everthing has to be the answer, as stated, I believe what needs to be done is find an alternative choice that can reflect and respect solutions to the oppositions on all sides of this subject.

Are you against such a notion?
8,531 posted on 04/25/2007 7:01:13 AM PDT by Just sayin (Is is what it is, for if it was anything else, it would be isn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4951 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson