Europe Shariatized: Wife-Beating Legitimized by German Court

chroniclesmagazine.org ^ | March 26, 2007 | Srdja Trifkovic

[montyspython]

Women of Europe beware, sharia beatings coming to a household near you.

[SF Republican]

Auchtung baby!

[wastedyears]

Let’s pull all Americans out of Germany. No reason they should be subjected to that.

[montyspython]

According to Allah’s commandment to men (Kuran 2:223), “Your wives are as a soil to be cultivated unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will.” Therefore “the righteous women are devoutly obedient.” Those that are not inhabit the nether regions of hell. Muhammad has stated that most of those who enter hell are women, not men. Contemporary Azhar scholars of Egypt agree: “Oh, assembly of women, give charity, even from your jewelry, for you (comprise) the majority of the inhabitants of hell in the day of resurrection.” In the same spirit, courts in Muslim countries, to mention a particularly egregious legal practice, routinely sentence raped women to death for “adultery,” usually by stoning, because they follow the sharia that mandates this punishment.

I'd like to see Oprah try and address this one and see what kind of response she gets from the muslim community.

[Gay State Conservative]

It would be interesting to see how the European Court of Human Rights (to which all citizens of EU countries have access) might rule on this case.

[SF Republican]

In response from NOW - The National Organization of Women:

[goodwithagun]

I find it ironic that Germany, in response to the Virginia Tech murders, has recently criticized the US for our violent culture.

[apillar]

I wonder what the multicultural loving femi-nazi’s are going to say about this...

[dsmatuska]

Good women are obedient...

And hard to find. ;-)

[tsmith130]

A spokesman for the court, Bernhard Olp, said the judge did not intend to suggest that violence in a marriage is acceptable, or that the Kuran supersedes German law. “The ruling is not justifiable, but the judge herself cannot explain it at this moment,” he said.

Uh...what?!

[PGalt]

Great article by Srdja Trifkovic. Thanks for posting.

Possible solution here...

Wives and Women

A systematic behaviour of a husband to force his wife to follow gender apartheid rules for religious reasons is a crime against integration (CAI) and punished by a fine or a prison term. There are many variations of that behaviour: an unwillingness to let the woman in the family learn the language of the new country or get an education; forbidding her to leave the home generally, or to work outside the home because of religious rules; or forbidding her to meet muslim women without hijabs, or nonmuslim women or men; forcing her to dress according to the Islamic code despite her unwillingness to do so; forbidding her to swim in public baths; not allowing her to use contraceptives despite her wishes; not to use male doctors etc. Other Islamic rules that belong to the gender apartheid group, regard forcing the wife to have sex, beating her etc. Those are already treated in the criminal law of X-country. It is necessary now to extend the force of law to other types of behaviour. Such behaviour is a reason also for denying custody to the most guilty parent in case of divorce or during marriage, and paying damages to the least guilty parent in case of divorce. If the woman or wife asks for help from a court against such CAIs during the marriage, it shall be able to force the man to change his behaviour by sentencing him to prison or paying a fine.

A systematic behaviour of the type described above against any female relative, or female living in his home, and which a man has power over according to laws or customs from their home country, is a CAI and shall be punished in the same way.

More here...

http://www.islam-watch.org/NoSharia/PreventEuropeIslamization6.htm

Many, many thanks to NoSharia

[montyspython]

Physical violence against one’s wife, far from being Haram, remains divinely ordained and practically advised in modern Islam. “Take in thine hand a branch and smite therewith and break not thine oath,” the Kuran commands. Muslim propagators in the West “explain” that the Islamic teaching and practice is in line with the latest achievements of clinical psychology: it is not only correct, but positively beneficial to them because “women’s rebelliousness (nushuz) is a medical condition” based either on her masochistic delight in being beaten and tortured, or sadistic desire to hurt and dominate her husband.

Complete depravity, islam needs to be eradicated, period.

[PGalt]

It would be interesting to see how the European Court of Human Rights (to which all citizens of EU countries have access) might rule on this case.

Yes it would. BTTT!

[freedomson]

LOL!

[montyspython]

It’s a medical condition, duh, what was I thinking?

[Kolb]

Ach du Lieber Himmel!

[montyspython]

Maybe the German court will find it acceptable to call women "nappy headed hos", it only seems like a natural extension.

Maybe we should move Rosie to Germany, she could use a good flogging.

[thesearethetimes...]

“...Her Honor wrote, in which it is common for husbands to beat their wives—and the Kuran sanctions such treatment. “The [husband’s] exercise of the right to castigate does not fulfill the hardship criteria as defined by Paragraph 1565” of German federal law...”

What in the world?!

Admittedly, I have not finished reading the full text yet, but Good Grief!! So we can surmise that his threat to KILL his wife did not “fulfill the criteria” either?!

GAH!

tatt

[montyspython]

This is the new “slap my bitch up” law, burqa beatings.