Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCloskey leaves Republican Party
Contra Costa Times ^ | April 16, 2007 | Lisa Vorderbrueggen

Posted on 04/16/2007 12:31:17 PM PDT by calcowgirl

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-147 next last
To: Zionist Conspirator
You think correctly.

Pete McCloskey and Paul Findley are the cofounders in 1989 of an anti-Israel lobbying group called "The Council For The National Interest."

Both have counted the Jews and unborn children as their most nefarious enemies for decades.

81 posted on 04/16/2007 1:31:51 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Not really. Let me know when you graduate from Kindergarten. I don’t argue with 5 year olds!


82 posted on 04/16/2007 1:32:39 PM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Republican ethics scandals?

William Jefferson
Sandy Berger

Shall I continue? My list would be quite long and have nary an R after a name.


83 posted on 04/16/2007 1:32:51 PM PDT by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we write in marble. JHuett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zionist Conspirator

Oh, and I almost forgot: Pete McCloskey gave the keynote speech at the Institute For Historical Review’s 2000 annual meeting.


84 posted on 04/16/2007 1:33:08 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; NormsRevenge; Clintonfatigued; JohnnyZ; AuH2ORepublican; Kuksool; BlackElk; ...

Petey was never a Republican, he was an anti-Zionist, anti-Semite Lowell Weicker Marxist sockcucker before Weicker came to Congress. At least he’s finally in the right party with his fellow goosestepping diaperheaded bomb-throwing piglets.


85 posted on 04/16/2007 1:39:08 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Would you vote for President a guy who married his cousin? Me, neither. Accept no RINOs. Fred in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Pombo lost because Pombo was a corrupt sunuvab**** who had no place in politics. Pombo was repeatedly caught voting in favor of those who donated to him, and screwed his own constituents on many occasions simply because it benefited one of his donors. People around here were sick of him, they were sick of his antics, and they were sick of his smugness. The last straw was his suggestion that we sell 15 national parks...not a wise move in an area that sees a HUGE economic windfall from the national parks in the Sierras (huge numbers of tourists drive through Pombo’s former district to reach the parks, and most of us who live here grew up day-tripping to the Sierras).

I don’t know of any Republicans who voted for the communist who replaced Pombo, and I don’t even know many who voted for McCloskey, but very few voted for Pombo either. Most Republicans around here were so disgusted with Pombo that they just skipped the election, or at least that particular race. McNerney won by default, not because he convinced people that he’s a better candidate. If the local Republican party runs a decent candidate against McNerney in the next election, we WILL get the seat back. This is considered to be a Republican "safe" district, and Republicans hold a numeric advantage here. Pombo thought that designation made him election-proof. He found out the hard way that he was wrong.

Pombo should be treated as an object lesson by the Republican party. He is a perfect demonstration of the fact that you CANNOT abuse your constituents forever and expect them to keep taking it. In our district, the choice was between a loon Democrat and a dirtbag Republican. It was lose/lose. The difference is that Democrats have no standards, and therefore have no qualms about voting for loons. Republicans do have standards, and we draw certain moral lines in the sand.

Guiliani supporters should pay particularly close attention. Ignore the base, and you WILL lose. Republicans don’t like to vote for lousy candidates, even if it means the opposition will get an even worse one into the seat. That’s why Bush the elder lost in 1992, that’s why Pombo lost, it’s a big part of why we lost so many seats last year. We want good, honest, moral candidates. When we don't get them, we stay home.

86 posted on 04/16/2007 1:43:01 PM PDT by Arthalion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Gee....wonder what his price ($$$$$) was....


87 posted on 04/16/2007 1:44:50 PM PDT by goodnesswins (We need to cure Academentia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Wrong.
LOL
You're running on emotion, not fact. I remember those days well...back when Republicans supported limited government.

Only the Communists and Socialists advocated openly for it at that time.
Wrong.
The American Medical Association and the Republican Party both openly advocated for it at that time...Democrats called Republicans "baby killers".
.
88 posted on 04/16/2007 1:45:29 PM PDT by mugs99 (Don't take life too seriously, you won't get out alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
You think correctly.

Pete McCloskey and Paul Findley are the cofounders in 1989 of an anti-Israel lobbying group called "The Council For The National Interest."

Both have counted the Jews and unborn children as their most nefarious enemies for decades.

And I've been here at FR long enough to remember when it was absolutely full of people who looked upon these people as conservative heroes, for no other reason than that they hated Jews and Israel. Most of that human garbage is long gone, but there are still some left. They don't mouth off as often as they used to, though.

89 posted on 04/16/2007 1:46:07 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Kol mishkav 'asher yishkav `alayv hazav yitma' . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

“Until the past few weeks, I had hoped that the party could right itself, returning to the values of the Eisenhowers, Fords and George H. W. Bush.”

Funny how he skips over Reagan, a true sign that this guy was never a Republican. Only leftists and communists don’t subscribe to the Reagan ideal. I’ll label him the former since he actually served.


90 posted on 04/16/2007 1:50:29 PM PDT by Reagan Disciple (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
The American Medical Association and the Republican Party both openly advocated for it at that time

It wouldn't surprise me if the AMA did.

The GOP did not.

Republicans supported limited government.

Government's minimal function is criminalizing murder.

Democrats called Republicans "baby killers".

A title that accurately describes Jerry Ford and Nelson Rockefeller in the 70s, but not many GOPers in 1948.

Of course, Pete McCloskey's fevered brain is full of other bizarre notions as well.

91 posted on 04/16/2007 1:51:08 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: dead
former congressman Pete McCloskey has left the GOP

I vaguely remember this turd when he was an actual congressman instead of a fomer congressman. He made Rockerfeller look conservative and Jeffords look loyal.

I'm wondering why the old coot is switching now. Perhaps he craves attention like Mark Felt did. I'm sure the enemedia will see that he gets his 15 minutes of fame.

92 posted on 04/16/2007 1:52:15 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

ROFL! Join the Democrats? I hope you enjoy the party of Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy, Robert Toricelli, Jim McGreevey, etc, etc, etc, etc.

Good riddance to bad rubbish . . .


93 posted on 04/16/2007 1:55:42 PM PDT by Princip. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Well the guy probably has performed good deeds in the past, but his brain has obviously become addled.


94 posted on 04/16/2007 2:04:14 PM PDT by driftless2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthalion
Pombo lost because Pombo was a corrupt sunuvab****

Repeating McCloskey talking points?

You allege he was corrupt--Do you have any proof? If so, post it. If not, can it.

95 posted on 04/16/2007 2:06:37 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

In the political equivalent of human reproduction, Pete McCloskey never had a shot at being the lucky litle guy to fertilize the target. In fact, he not only failed to keep up with his fellow swimmers, he never realized that the dark foul-smelling cavity in which he was madly splashing about wasn’t even the right one.


96 posted on 04/16/2007 2:09:22 PM PDT by mkjessup ('President Rudy!!! = an aborted fetus in every pot, and no guns in any garage!!!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

I remember that Goldwater Himself went wacky left in his late dotage. Perhaps that’s what’s going on here to a degree, I am sad to say — although in fairness, McCloskey always was a soaking “wet.” What’s crazy-talk is his assertion that it’s principally the GOP that is CORRUPT. At best, the Dems are equal-opportunity corrupt.


97 posted on 04/16/2007 2:13:11 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; Clintonfatigued; JohnnyZ; Kuksool; AuH2ORepublican; BlackElk

Interesting to note this kook had one of the most singularly schizophrenic voting records in Congress. His overall ACU rating was a 32, piss-poor by Republican standards, but he scored in 1 year (1972, when he ran for President) a ZERO. Now realizing by 1981 when he was ginning up to run for the GOP Senate nomination, that an ultraleftist wouldn’t get the nomination, he moved into “Conservative” territory, earning an 86 rating, but slacking off to a below 60 the following year. An unprincipled opportunist of the highest order. It was then-San Diego Mayor Pete Wilson who beat McCloskey (and Congressman Barry Goldwater, Jr.), himself a RINO, but looking like Jesse Helms by comparison.


98 posted on 04/16/2007 2:13:54 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Would you vote for President a guy who married his cousin? Me, neither. Accept no RINOs. Fred in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Great Rhino heroes McCloskey...where’s the mentioning of Reagan? Eh?


99 posted on 04/16/2007 2:20:27 PM PDT by TexCon ("Strike while the iron is hot, and make it hotter by striking"-Oliver Cromwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

It’s time he confirmed what every sensible person has known for the past 30 years. Pete McCloskey is a fairly left-wing democrat.


100 posted on 04/16/2007 2:23:44 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson