I swear, everything that happens in the world could, at least by people on Free Republic, be construed as an act of terrorism by a Muslim extremist. It seems like some people automatically assume that the perpetrator is Muslim and then look for ways to tie that together, such as speculating that the hat was Muslim-related and that, if he was Chinese, then he was a Chinese Muslim. When I was in high school we had a of bomb threats, death threats, and so on. In a pre 9-11 world this same sort of thing happens, but we didn’t look for ways to tie it to Islam.
That said, based on the police press conference I watched earlier, they appear to be hinting at two shooters, seeing as the description of the first shooter doesn’t match the second. They have a “person of interest” that they’ve spoken to, but nothing more. I don’t know what’s going on there. Perhaps they have no evidence against this person, but that wouldn’t explain how or why they have a description. Odds of the two incidents happening the same day would be essentially nil (unless the second shooter heard about the first shooting, and decided to make today his day).
And why the hell shouldn't it? Wake up man! The Beltway snipers were Muzzies. The UNC driver was a Muzzie. John Doe # 2 in OKC is most likely Jose Padilla, a Muzzie.
Care to defend the murderous death cult any more?
It’s a POST 9/11 world, Mr. Silver.
You may want to do some research.
You’ll find this informative, I’m sure:
http://carnageandculture.blogspot.com/2007/03/srdja-trifkovic-utah-shootings-and.html
Such conjectures, in our current world state . . . happen to be the MOST likely.
Just the facts of life now.