[ScreamingFist]

I'll knock it off it you will submit that there are, and will always be a small percentage of responsible, 21 year old college students that should be able to practice their constitutional rights to self defense by carrying CCW on college classrooms/buildings. Writing CCW on campus off as such, that all students are irresponsible is, IMHO, irresponsible.

? That isn't the issue. If SF was king every one of these "21 year old college" students would have already been in the military. The issue is banning a 3 year member because he disagreed with the status norm. If you would like to see 21 year old with guns....swing over to LA, the gang bangers will give you a fine lesson on irresponsible juveniles with guns.....

For the few on campus that could and will own guns.....pfff......not allowed. Save you speeches for those that that don't know better....

[2nd amendment mama]

If you would like to see 21 year old with guns....swing over to LA, the gang bangers will give you a fine lesson on irresponsible juveniles with guns.....

Are you saying that 21 year olds are juveniles??? Excuse me, but 21 yo is an ADULT!

[DCBryan1]

swing over to LA, the gang bangers will give you a fine lesson on irresponsible juveniles with guns.....

1) gang bangers are criminals,
2) 21 year olds are not juveniles.

With that being said, I have had my fill of law enforcement duty and am well aware of those that shouldn't have a gun.

I will concede to you that banning a 3 year member is harsh and I HEARTILY agree that we should have compulsary military service (or for the pacifists, a peace corps) before being able to attend college or vote. I apologize to you for the misunderstanding.