Posted on 04/11/2007 6:16:36 AM PDT by Kitten Festival
I understand where you are coming from, but I don't accept that statement.
For the sake of argument, I'll accept the fact that the earth has warmed. What I will not accept is the hypothesis that it will continue to do so. An analysis of the strategic effects of future weather would have to take into account that it might be getting warmer over the next 50 years, but also that it might be getting colder, or that it might not change at all.
Trends, whatever their cause, usually end. Past weather trends were up and down, and all but the current one has ended. Guessing when a trend will or will not end is risky business, and we have no scientific basis to conclude how long the current trend will last.
We’re having the coldest April since records started being kept 134 years ago.
I see why the eco-nuts changed “Global Warming” to “Climate Change”. Right now, I’d guess that over the next hundred years, it would be about even money that we’re heading for a new ice age rather than a hockey stick steam bath.
This is the effect of the political climate that uses propaganda movies to push agendas. Real, hard hitting "documentaries" like Fahrenheit-911 (that PROVES there is no terror in the world but that which WE create) and "An Inconvenient Truth" (that PROVES we are the cause of all weather problems too.)
I think I'm going to be sick.
If someone needs to apply the term “RINO” to a politician, Hagel wins without opposition.
ENTROPY??
Sooner or later, we're all gonna be at the same temperature.
I will agree to that.
Just by posting 3 times dosen't make "you", "we". Schizophrenia anyone? Maybe you should get a few additioal screen names to go with whatever meglomaniacal pathology you have.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.