Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AFPhys

You are correct, sir. My first REAL reading of the Geneva Convention was when there waqs discussion about whther the "enemy combatants" at Gitmo should be considered criminals (terrorists), and held according to criminal law; or whether they qualified for protection under the Geneva Convention. I am of the mind that they are criminals and not enemy combatants, as defined by the Geneva Convention.


28 posted on 04/01/2007 5:02:50 PM PDT by StarCMC (FR is a success, in spite of all...cats they've sacrificed ...demon gods they've prayed to. - Bryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: StarCMC

They are illegal combatants.

They should be lined up and shot after being wrung dry.


47 posted on 04/01/2007 5:25:20 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Taz Struck By Lightning Faces Battery Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: StarCMC

http://www.ejectejecteject.com/archives/000125.html

Read part I and II of Sanctuary.

Best essay I ever read about the Uniforms and Code of Conduct.

All of his stuff is just superb.


50 posted on 04/01/2007 5:27:58 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (Taz Struck By Lightning Faces Battery Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson