April 5th D-Day for Iran Leaked by Russia?

AntiMullah ^ | 03/24/07 | Alan Peters/Commenters

[FARS]

When Russians began scrambling to get our of the way and the UN sanction vote was unanimous, the signs were becoming the writing on the wall.

[FARS]

This date is close to what some Freepers have been saying privately.

[GSlob]

Well, against a deep underground facility which is even offset from its entrances and ventilation shafts, nothing would work better than a sizable nuke. Indeed one could argue that nothing else would work.

[Jo Nuvark]

If one of the bloggers could translate a couple of
paragraphs of the article I would be very grateful.

Ping to Alouette!

[Chena]

Hmmmmmmm BUMP

[loreldan]

There's no way an attack is imminent. There's no such thing as a surprise attack (by us) anymore. Before we attack there will be umpteen warnings and many leaks. We'll know an attack is imminent, just not the exact date.

[Pub Linkser--80]

It could happen next month, but my view is we'll see more covert operations and continued economic and diplomatic pressure until at least the 4th quarter of this year. If that doesn't work, we could see surgical airstrikes in the 4th quarter of 2007. Pop some popcorn...this will be quite a show before it's over.

[theFIRMbss]

>April 5th D-Day for Iran Leaked by Russia?

One strange part of this
is Iran picked a bad time [?!]
to kidnap those Brits.

Now, Coalition
forces massing _near_ Iran
can pretend [?] to be

a rescue mission.
Hell, even the invasion
can be a "rescue" . . .

[Pub Linkser--80]

That sounds right, unless Israel launches a bombing attack. The Israelis would probably have to attack without warning.

[stm]

Nothing like our "allies" tipping off the enemy. No matter. That facility will be a pile of bricks soon enough.

[Cementjungle]

There's no way an attack is imminent. There's no such thing as a surprise attack (by us) anymore. Before we attack there will be umpteen warnings and many leaks. We'll know an attack is imminent, just not the exact date.

I too think an attack is likely not imminent. I do however think it's a good thing to keep them guessing, as it's likely to consume their resources having to be on alert all the time.

[FARS]

Specially with the Chinese and Russians providing intel to the Islamic regime on a regular basis using their own more sophisiticated technologies than possessed by Iran.

[sageb1]

bookmark

[TommyDale]

The world will be informed of our surprise attack when it is published in the New York Times.

[trebb]

There's no way an attack is imminent. There's no such thing as a surprise attack (by us) anymore. Before we attack there will be umpteen warnings and many leaks. We'll know an attack is imminent, just not the exact date.

Perhaps, but knowing the absolute certainty that there are traitors in the Congress, and other high offices, the Prez is much more likely to surprise everyone if he deems a no-warning attack necessary.

[Pub Linkser--80]

Suffice it to say that congressional democRATs will not be informed in advance of any airstrikes by the US or Israel.

[freema]

Ping that follows your ping : ^ {

[null and void]

It's also very close to a full moon.

[null and void]

One could. One would be wrong.

[theFIRMbss]

>There's no such thing as a surprise attack (by us) anymore

Remember those Brits?
One or more of those fifteen
may be James Bond types

and the whole "capture"
may have been inserting them
with tiny gadgets . . .

(Yeah, it sounds crazy,
but I've never figured out
why the Brit gunboat

allowed its Marines
to be captured with no fight.
Spying's a reason . . .)