Skip to comments.
Mars Melt Hints at Solar, Not Human, Cause for Warming, Scientist Says
National Geographic ^
| February 28, 2007
| Kate Ravilious
Posted on 03/24/2007 5:51:38 AM PDT by moneyrunner
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181 next last
To: randog
I doubt that Mars dropped from 1945 to 1975 because there were no particular changes in the sun over that period versus 1900 to 1945 and 1975 to present that would have caused such a drop.
61
posted on
03/24/2007 7:10:21 AM PDT
by
palmer
(Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
To: moneyrunner
PORPOISE ESCAPES EARTH FOR COOLER CLIMATE!
To: Nathan Zachary
We do btw, have warm and cold cycles every 22 years, every 10 years in fact. They coincide with wet and dry cycles Your post is interesting but I would like to see more data about it depicting the climate variations to the sunspot variations. If you have such data, please post, I will include it my global warming web page. I do know there is a slight global temperature variation over the 22 year sunspot cycle, but only very slight (doesn't rise above the noise in a Fourier transform).
63
posted on
03/24/2007 7:14:12 AM PDT
by
palmer
(Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
To: moneyrunner
one of my public libraries just got a new copy of "earth in balance!" by al goron.
i'm one of the few people that read it when it was first published.
it's written in the see-dick-and-jane-style. the thesis of the book is that we children of ma earth have made her sick.
it's such a s-t-u-p-i-d book!
64
posted on
03/24/2007 7:14:23 AM PDT
by
ken21
(it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
To: moneyrunner
NOOOO, this means we don't need Socialist, Communist rule.
65
posted on
03/24/2007 7:14:46 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Freep Fox they drop the ball on GOE)
To: palmer
"The sun's changes undoubtedly affect both planets in various ways, but there should be no appreciable lag in changes." That's hard to tell, because Mars has a much different atmosphere. Earth is 2/3 or so water, more gases.
To: palmer
Palmer,
Can we agree on a few thing? Can we agree that the sun is a more powerful force than an SUV?
67
posted on
03/24/2007 7:18:15 AM PDT
by
moneyrunner
(I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
To: moneyrunner
I agree that the sun is a more powerful force than all the SUV's in the world.
68
posted on
03/24/2007 7:19:04 AM PDT
by
palmer
(Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
To: palmer
Only one explanation for global warming on Mars. Al's Hollywood friends have built too many 40-room mansions up there and are flying around Mars in all those fuel-wasting private jets.
69
posted on
03/24/2007 7:26:28 AM PDT
by
Liberty Wins
(Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten these.)
To: palmer
Here's some info on the effects of Cosmic radiation entering Earth's atmosphere.
Exploding_Stars_Influence_Climate_Of_Earth "It is already well-established that when cosmic rays, which are high-speed atomic particles originating in exploded stars far away in the Milky Way, penetrate Earth's atmosphere they produce substantial amounts of ions and release free electrons.
Now, results from the Danish experiment show that the released electrons significantly promote the formation of building blocks for cloud condensation nuclei on which water vapour condenses to make clouds.
Hence, a causal mechanism by which cosmic rays can facilitate the production of clouds in Earth's atmosphere has been experimentally identified for the first time."
Did solar activity drive 20th century global warming?
Little Ice Age (Solar Influence - Temperature)
many other articles
To: palmer
Would you go a step farther and agree that the sun is orders of magnitude more important to global temperatures than all of the human activity ever performed?
71
posted on
03/24/2007 7:27:44 AM PDT
by
moneyrunner
(I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
To: palmer
I doubt that Mars dropped from 1945 to 1975 because there were no particular changes in the sun over that period versus 1900 to 1945 and 1975 to present that would have caused such a drop.This chart (from Wikipedia) would suggest otherwise:
72
posted on
03/24/2007 7:29:49 AM PDT
by
randog
(What the...?!)
To: Piquaboy
No, it is because of the two Mars Rovers
To: palmer
Would you also agree that computer models of the climate are inexact and will give virtually any answer you want if you vary the input?
Would you also agree that you can prove virtually anything with a data series by simply moving the beginning and the endpoint?
74
posted on
03/24/2007 7:31:58 AM PDT
by
moneyrunner
(I have not flattered its rank breath, nor bowed to its idolatries a patient knee.)
To: moneyrunner
The sun is orders of magnitude more important than any greenhouse effect and any changes in greenhouse effect that man may have caused. However, the changes in the sun are relatively small compared to changes in other natural and manmade factors. I also believe natural (including solar) are more important than any manmade changes, but I can't quantify how much more important.
75
posted on
03/24/2007 7:32:30 AM PDT
by
palmer
(Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
To: moneyrunner
If it takes Fuel, Heat, Oxygen and Chain Reaction for fire to exist...where is the sun getting all that oxygen from?
76
posted on
03/24/2007 7:33:31 AM PDT
by
FDNYRHEROES
(Always bring a liberal to a gunfight)
To: Nathan Zachary
The cosmic ray influence is interesting, unknown and may be important. But the same process cannot occur on Mars because of lack of atmospheric water vapor.
77
posted on
03/24/2007 7:34:02 AM PDT
by
palmer
(Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
To: randog
The wikipedia diagram supports my argument. The lack of sunspots helped cause cooling in some way in the 1600's. A relative lack of sunspots from 1900 to 1945 correlated with warming. A relative glut of sunspots in the 1950's correlated with cooling. And there is no global temperature swing every 22 years to correspond to the short term cycle.
So long run, yeah, sunspots have an important influence and can explain some of the warming today. But it would have to be through the cosmic ray modulation effect or something like that which doesn't apply to Mars.
78
posted on
03/24/2007 7:38:17 AM PDT
by
palmer
(Money problems do not come from a lack of money, but from living an excessive, unrealistic lifestyle)
To: palmer
The sun can not cause global warming because Algore invented the sun.
79
posted on
03/24/2007 7:42:14 AM PDT
by
TYVets
(God so loved the world he didn't send a committee)
To: bmwcyle
This issue and debate has NOTHING to do with the Sun. Or climate in general, for that matter.
As a political debate, green is the new red.
THAT is all you need to know and understand about 'climate change'.
~faith.
80
posted on
03/24/2007 7:45:19 AM PDT
by
ziravan
(winning the lotto one vote at a time.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 181 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson