Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NEW JERSEY COURT RECOGNIZES SECOND AMENDMENT AND HOLDS THAT IT TRUMPS GUN FORFEITURE LAW
Website News ^ | 3/19/07 | Evan Nappen, Attorney at Law

Posted on 03/20/2007 9:41:22 AM PDT by Revtwo

A New Jersey Superior Court has recognized the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and held that a citizen’s Constitutional Right to Keep and Bear Arms cannot be involuntarily waived under a New Jersey firearms forfeiture law.

“The recognition of Second Amendment rights in New Jersey is long overdue,” said attorney Evan F. Nappen, whose law firm (including Richard V. Gilbert, Esq. and Louis P. Nappen, Esq.) represented appellant Dennis W. Peterson in the Warren County case. “In this appeal, the Second Amendment was applied to New Jersey via the Constitutional doctrine of fundamental fairness, overcoming a significant legal hurdle needed for the Federal Bill of Rights to apply to the State.”

This decision coincides with the recent Parker v. District of Columbia case, in which the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia struck down a decades-old handgun ban in Washington, D.C. on the ground that it violates the Second Amendment.

“The legal significance of the Second Amendment is finally being recognized by American courts,” Nappen continued, “and this New Jersey case is part of a growing trend in American jurisprudence.”

(Excerpt) Read more at evannappen.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: banglist; gun; newjersey; rkba; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last

1 posted on 03/20/2007 9:41:26 AM PDT by Revtwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Revtwo

Thank goodness. My NRA $$ is paying off.


2 posted on 03/20/2007 9:43:42 AM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo; Joe Brower

The beat goes on.


3 posted on 03/20/2007 9:44:33 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo

Wow, two courts in about a week actually recognizing the Constitution. Maybe there's hope after all.


4 posted on 03/20/2007 9:44:42 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo

WOW, a New Jersey judge up-holds 2nd Amendment. What's next?


5 posted on 03/20/2007 9:46:10 AM PDT by geo40xyz (Born a democRAT, Dad set me free in 1952: He said that I was not required to be a MF'ing democRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo; bang_list

added the banglist keyword so the list can find it.


6 posted on 03/20/2007 9:47:11 AM PDT by Petruchio (Single, Available, Easy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Thank goodness. My NRA $$ is paying off.

But not in the D.C. case, which the N.R.A. would have nothing to do with.

7 posted on 03/20/2007 9:47:12 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

I think that's a mischaracterization. They have always supported lifting the onerous gun control laws in DC.


8 posted on 03/20/2007 9:48:41 AM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: geo40xyz
"What's next?"

More socialist wailing and scheming.

9 posted on 03/20/2007 9:49:07 AM PDT by labette (To hit the ball and touch 'em all. A moment in the sun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo
Cool! A double-barreled defeat for the gun-banning nuts on the Left.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

10 posted on 03/20/2007 9:51:17 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant


"I think that's a mischaracterization"

You are right, it was a mischaracterization for me to say the N.R.A. would have nothing to do with the D.C. case. They actually opposed it.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1803404/posts


11 posted on 03/20/2007 9:51:30 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo

The scope is very small, but the precedent is huge. The guy voluntarily relinquished firearms he had had on him during a domestic dispute. Four years later, NJ wrote a law denying the right to own a gun to anyone who had previously had a gun siezed or voluntarily relinquished a gun.

The immediate crisis is sort of an ex post facto: a man was denied his rights for an action he committed before the law depriving of his rights was written. Hence, the tiny scope: The NJ law isn't necessarily unconstitutional, since NJ may have a valid reason for its deprivation of rights. But what is huge is the courts recogniztion that the NJ deprives people of an actual right: to bear arms.


12 posted on 03/20/2007 9:52:01 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo
The courts are where the real power lies in determining the direction of the country.

Whether a particular Republican President is as pristinely conservative as would be desired is not nearly as important as who they get confirmed to the USSC.

The fact that the USSC is decidedly more conservative than when Dubya entered office sends a message to lower courts, and we are seeing their response to that message in these recent decisions.

Dubya has disappointed me in many ways, but Presidents are in power for eight years at most.

Judges are in power for life.

13 posted on 03/20/2007 9:52:01 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo
UN-F'ING BELIEVABLE!!!!! In NJ of all places!!!!

Suddenly I feel faint.

14 posted on 03/20/2007 9:52:22 AM PDT by tcostell (MOLON LABE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: labette

More socialist wailing and scheming.

OOOOH! Good! This should be fun. I'll bring the chips. Who's got the cheese tray? LOL


15 posted on 03/20/2007 9:53:21 AM PDT by trimom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gc4nra

ping


16 posted on 03/20/2007 9:53:46 AM PDT by Blue Collar Republican (I am the rightful father of Anna Nicole's money... er, I mean baby.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo

Mr. Nappen is a treasure for us NJ residents. If not for his hard work and dilligence, we'd be disarmed state-wide by now. Given the current state of our elected officials, it's amazing this ruling has been rendered. Thank you Evan!


17 posted on 03/20/2007 9:54:24 AM PDT by paulcissa (Only YOU can prevent liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo

First, Washington DC and now New Jersy.


[Has a massive dose of sanity been released on our courts????]


Libs will go into meltdown.


18 posted on 03/20/2007 9:54:30 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

The NRA wants to get the most important gun rights issues before the SCOTUS after one of the other libs croaks. It is a strategy, but they certainly have lobbied forever to kill the DC gun control regime.


19 posted on 03/20/2007 9:55:22 AM PDT by pissant (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo
Didn't a Federal court already make in similar ruling within the past few weeks?

If so, wouldn't this ruling merely be symbolic?
20 posted on 03/20/2007 9:55:23 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS (Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson