I would be more than happy to answer your questions if you answer mine. Remember, the answer is ONLY A or B. That's what it feels like to be on the horns of a false dilemma.
I am obviously not a social conservative. As I continue to post to Free Republic, it's become obvious to me that I am really more socially liberal. Gay marriage - who cares? Without security, what does it matter.
As far as being a pro life president is concerned - George Bush was pro life, and as far as I know, Roe v. Wade is STILL the law of the land. Who's going to overturn that?
I'm giong to vote for the person who will keep America safe. I'm not going to vote for somebody who is pro life if I don't think that is the best person for the country.
Whatever your false dilemna tact is - I'm not following it. I'll just try to be clear in MY OPINION that it doesnt' matter if we have a social conservative leading our country right now if he or she doesn't lead on the WOT. And anyway, I've realized I'm not a social conservative.
I see you're actually from California. So I'm going to surmise that as a social conservative, Tom McClintock was your man in the election of 2003. And that you sat the last election out.