Just as a side note, why is WND considered not credible? I'm curious.
People who look to the MSM for acceptable Republican candidates don't appreciate websites like WND.
Well most Freepers think their stories are tabloid like in nature. Not much that they say is based on hard evidence.
It depends on the subject.
This same excellent, conservative author has been praised for his writings in the past: on Islam & CAIR, against Jesse Jackson, against slavery apologists/reparations, against abortion, in favor of John Roberts for SCOTUS, against entitlement-minded parents.
When he goes after RINOs, which he has always done, well, the source is dismissed instead.