The Great Disconnect between the Republican Party and the Conservative Base

vanity | 12 March 2007 | Trueblackman

[Youngstown]

Here's my question to you, my friend - Overall did we lose more under Clinton or under President Bush?

Other than somehwhat better judges under Bush, the Bush administration has been a complete disaster.

As horrendous as the assault on the Constitution by the Clintons was, that by Bush has been much worse - especially since it was done by "one of our own" and NO ONE resisted.

Habeus Corpus, a principal of law since the Magna Carta, no longer exists for any "enemy of the state".

Thank God that Bob Barr and Richard Viguerie now intend to fight that from the RIGHT!

Hilary, even in her wildest dreams, ever thought that even she could get away with that!

Therefore unless we have a candidate who understands fully the dire nature of our precent situation, electing another CINO/RINO would be the final nail in the coffin - one from which no future resistance would EVER be possible.

A message for the Johnny-come-latelys to conservatism, (not yourself), who have no grasp of its principles in the least and who want to win at any cost and as such campaign as Hillary-lite: if you thought 2006 was bad, just wait until 2008 unless you give us what we want.

Ron Paul, freedom, and America as it should be.

[Owen]

All silliness.

Conservatives should not support anyone. No one. They should oppose the most liberal of options and act to deny that most liberal of options power.

That is how you prevent leftward slides. You do not allow the most leftward of options power.

It is not clear to me why this is hard to understand. It IS clear to me that this sort of debate greatly helps the traitorous Democrats and therefore it is in their best interests to perpetually cause such debate.