au contraire...a WH pardon for Libby is the worst possible scenario for Hillary. Look, assume that by next February she's wrapped up the nomination, or is close to doing so. Now, Bush pardons Libby, and the left/lib/MSM/blogosphere goes collectively apes**t...well, then, let's have the discussion of how the Clintons in 2000, sold pardons to convicted felons., like Marc Rich...including several who were "clients" of Hillary's brothers..the Rodham boys. It woun't be good for her..
On Chrissy M's show, they're already assuming she's won and wondering aloud what Bill's role will be. This early speculation and adoration reminds me so much of Dean 2004. Her phony Southern accent wasn't quite the Dean Scream, but it was the latest in many gaffes she'll have until next summer. I'm just going to sit back and watch while she unravels like an old Titleist.
A Bush pardon for Libby prior to the 2008 election would be bad for the Rep candidate who could use the Clinton pardons against Hillary, if she is indeed the nominee. A Libby pardon would negate some of that.
"let's have the discussion of how the Clintons in 2000, sold pardons to convicted felons., like Marc Rich...including several who were "clients" of Hillary's brothers..the Rodham boys. It woun't be good for her.."
well, that's assuming that anyone in the MSM would bring up the comparison... and that's assuming a lot.
Remember, even on Fox news, Chris Wallace didn't counterattack the assertion that Bush firing federal prosecutors was not only political but practially unheard of, ... and he says 'he didn't know' and, sadly, I believe him.