Tables turned on Fahrenheit 9/11’s maker

TimesOnline ^ | March 04 | Tony Allen-Mills

[FARS]

THE hunter has become the hunted. Michael Moore, the celebrated left-wing film-maker, has become the unwilling subject of a new documentary that raises damaging questions about the credibility of his work.

The director and star of successful documentaries such as Roger & Me, Bowling for Columbine and Fahrenheit 9/11, Moore has repeatedly been accused by his right-wing enemies of distorting or manipulating the material in his films. On his website he dismisses his critics as “wacko attackos”.

Yet the latest assault on Moore’s film-making techniques has come from an unexpected quarter. In Manufacturing Dissent, a documentary to be shown for the first time at a Texas film festival on Saturday, a pair of left-wing Canadian film-makers take Moore to task for what they describe as a disturbing pattern of fact-fudging and misrepresentation.

“When we started this project we hoped to have done a documentary that celebrated Michael Moore. We were admirers and fans,” said Debbie Melnyk, who made the film with her husband, Rick Caine. “Then we found out certain facts about his documentaries that we hadn’t known before. We ended up very disappointed and disillusioned.”

Melnyk and Caine are best known for their previous documentary Citizen Black, about Conrad Black, the Canadian-born former proprietor of The Daily Telegraph. Last week both of them acknowledged an important debt to Moore for popularising the documentary genre.

Yet when Caine and Melnyk began to follow him as part of their own documentary, their efforts to interview him met with the same kind of obstruction, denial and, ultimately, physical ejection that Moore had suffered when he tried to track down Roger Smith, the former chief executive of General Motors, for his first film, Roger & Me.

It was in Flint, Michigan, Moore’s former home town, that Caine and Melnyk made the first discovery that they say rocked their confidence in his approach. Roger & Me was a hugely successful account of what Moore portrayed as a fruitless task to force Smith to answer questions about GM’s policies in closing the car manufacturing plants that had long been Flint’s economic lifeline.

Caine and Melnyk claim that Moore interviewed Smith on camera twice. But the scenes were left on the cutting room floor, apparently for greater dramatic effect.

Manufacturing Dissent includes a long catalogue of alleged exaggerations or distortions in several of Moore’s films. In Bowling for Columbine, a scathing indictment of US gun violence, Moore visited Toronto to show parts of the city that were supposedly so free of crime everyone left their front doors unlocked.

“In the film, Michael makes it look as though 100% of the doors were unlocked, but his local producer told us it was really only 40%,” said Caine.

Caine and Melnyk said they had hoped to interview Moore about his views on how much editing was acceptable before a factual documentary turned into misleading propaganda.

“We had met him at a premiere of the Columbine film in Toronto, and he said, ‘Oh yes, talk to my people and they’ll set something up’,” said Caine. “We then called his people and they said he’s not doing any more interviews in Toronto. We had his e-mail, we sent a letter to his lawyers, we had his phone number in New York. But each time he said no.”

Then Caine and Melnyk began to run into open hostility. Eventually, in a scene that might have come from Roger & Me, they were bundled out of an event at Kent State University, where Moore’s sister, Anne, knocked aside Caine’s camera.

Moore is reportedly editing his next film, Sicko, about the US healthcare system, and a spokesman said he had no comment on Manufacturing Dissent. On his website he dismissed critics of Bowling for Columbine as “lying liars” and claimed that “organised groups [are] going full blast trying to discredit me”.

Yet Caine and Melnyk insist they should not be confused with the right-wing hordes who want to damage Moore.

“If you have to sell out your values and principles to get at a greater truth, where does that leave you?” said Melnyk.

“If we think it’s wrong for the government to lie and manipulate, how do we think that [left-wingers] doing it is the solution?”

[AmericanArchConservative]

Even more than this, Michael Moore is absolutely guilty of overwhelming hypocrisy. He has preached against owning stocks as "immoral", and "a rich man's game", excoriated "wealthy Republicans" for their stock holdings and been a longtime critic of Halliburton...

But he has himself owned literally tens of thousands of dollars - and profited from 10 to 15 percent {or more} on stock holdings which included - you guessed it - Halliburton, as well as Loral and other defense industry giants.

He is gearing up for a run at the health care and pharmaceutical industries - but his stock portfolio has included Pharmacia, Pfizer, and other names which are by all means and measures, a "Who's who" honour roll of that industry's top performers. Moore has criticized institutions, industries and individuals in America for rampant racism, and vicariously lacking any motive towards achieving equity towards blacks...even telling the journalism field at large that they ought to strive for at least 5% black hiring as an initial quota...

Yet through all his years of producing "mock-u-mentaries", including cameramen, producers, key grips, writers, setbuilders - you name it - he has averaged employing black Americans at somewhat less than 3% in any capacity whatsoever...

Worse than that, Moore's primary residence is in a very exclusive community which has only 2.5% minorities of any sort - and NONE of them whatsoever are black!

MM has also ralied against union-busters everywhere he goes, trying to cast himself as a friend to the everyday working man of America

but he has not, to date, allowed the formation of a single union under his employ, has not hired a single union worker, and has threatened to fire one of two primary writers working for him on a television project when the issue of the writer's union and receiving writing credit for their work on the project came up for discussion.

On top of that, much of the potentially costly post-production work done on a majority of his projects...

...has been done with inexpensive, non-union labour, across the northern border in Canada.

So apparently he believes {personally} in outsourcing, too!