Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Severe poverty in U.S. hits high
The Buffalo News ^ | 2/25/2007 | By TONY PUGH

Posted on 03/02/2007 3:11:24 PM PST by MovementConservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last
To: YOUGOTIT
I think that these stats don't consider government transfer payments. Also, many poor people work under the table and pay no taxes. Others are out of work for a while, get support from government and churches and the go back to work.
41 posted on 03/02/2007 4:49:11 PM PST by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: appeal2
Total BS crap agreed! There are so many gubmint programs out there to help the 'super/hyper poor' that any one who is hungry is either a criminal hiding out or stupid.
42 posted on 03/02/2007 4:56:38 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: common denominator
You might want to get some facts by reading the new book "Who Really Cares?" which explodes the myth that the right is uncaring. The facts are the opposite.
43 posted on 03/02/2007 5:14:18 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MovementConservative
Severe poverty is most pronounced near the Mexican border

Oh gee, there's a surprise.

44 posted on 03/02/2007 5:16:02 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MovementConservative
Washington, D.C., the nation's capital, has a higher concentration of severely poor people - 10.8 percent in 2005 -

There's a good example of what the causes of poverty are. The Washington Metropolitan area has an unemployment rate of something like 3.7%. The suburban jobs are easily accessible by subway and/or bus.

But the Washington school system is abysmal. Even the few who graduate are often functionally illiterate. Most of the children are born to unwed teen-age mothers. And over half of the males are in the penal system somehow.
The drug trade is alive and well, but that income isn't counted in these statistics.

The solution to poverty in this country is obvious. Give the kids an education. Tell them to stay off drugs and not have children until they are married and one of the parents has a job. Walter Williams says it; John McWhorter says it; Bill Cosby says it; and now Juan Williams is saying it.

Until we fix the educational system, we're not going to improve a thing.

45 posted on 03/02/2007 5:16:38 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MovementConservative
while extremely poor Hispanics of any race (3.7 million) are more than twice as likely.

Deport these illegals and half the problem is solved.

46 posted on 03/02/2007 5:20:42 PM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MovementConservative

Wonder how the extremely poor correlates with the extremely illegal immigrant.


47 posted on 03/02/2007 5:21:58 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (No stinking peanut butter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MovementConservative

How many of the kids have iPods or PS2?


48 posted on 03/02/2007 5:23:10 PM PST by mathluv (Never Forget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speekinout

When I was a young man, poverty was much less widespread.
And a majority of folks who were classified as "poor" still had morals and self respect.
Then LBJ kicked off the "Great Society"
This led to a major breakdown of the family structure.
Which led us to the mess we have today.


49 posted on 03/02/2007 5:26:09 PM PST by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

I agree with you completely. LBJ's "Great Society" made men expendable, if not a handicap. Mothers couldn't get benefits like welfare payments or subsidized housing if the father(s) of their babies were around.

How did we ever expect teen-aged girls to raise their boys to be men if they never had one in their lives?


50 posted on 03/02/2007 5:34:11 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: common denominator
Republicans consistently DO address the issue of poverty by cutting taxes. The economy is booming and there are good jobs going unfilled all over the country as we reach full employment. If you are motivated, hard working, punctual, and choose to not abuse substances, there's no reason to be poor. The best way to "care" for the poor is to sustain a robust, healthy and growing economy.
51 posted on 03/02/2007 5:35:55 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
"Then LBJ kicked off the "Great Society"
This led to a major breakdown of the family structure."

Excellent You Got It!!!

And the poor in Appalachia (who did not think they were poor, raised there) got poorer with LBJ and the left coming in and taking what they had and leaving rich.
52 posted on 03/02/2007 5:37:04 PM PST by YOUGOTIT (56 Supporters of al Qaeda are seated in the US Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I worked in small villages in China, a thousand miles inland, in the late 1970s. People lived in one-room mud wall buildings, no glass in the windows, earthen floors and thatched roofs. No running water, no electricity, no heating system, no sanitation, no phones. When nature called, you hung your naked bum over the neighborhood honey pot. The village "market" had fly-covered meat on display sitting on the dirt road. Cargo boats were pulled up the Yangtze River by men tugging on tow ropes. The boat loads of bricks were unloaded by children about 6 years old with 50 pound bamboo baskets on their backs. People were assigned to empying the honeypots and pouring the waste onto the fields.

That was POVERTY!

Of course, that's what our Global Warming friends desire for all of us in their zeal to end the consumption of fossil fuel.


53 posted on 03/02/2007 5:42:54 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Something baffles me, there - the Chinese have probably the second oldest society on earth, very stable, and with rules you can live with.

How come they still live in mud huts?

(Everybody swallow your communism comments - this particular phenomenon predates communism by, I dunno, 10,000 years?)

Why do the chinese, arguably the smartest people on earth (The Bell Curve), still live in freaking mud huts?

I am missing something, here.


54 posted on 03/02/2007 5:51:58 PM PST by patton (Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Dang. That sounds like a scene right of "The Good Earth!"


55 posted on 03/02/2007 5:57:59 PM PST by Ax ("An action transferred is an action completed.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: MovementConservative

"But since 2000, the number of severely poor has grown "more than any other segment of the population," according to a recent study in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine."

When was Bush elected?

Su casa, mi casa.


56 posted on 03/02/2007 6:00:12 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

People with no trackable income are hard to measure, what's new?


57 posted on 03/02/2007 6:01:29 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Extreme poverty means the batteries are dead.


58 posted on 03/02/2007 6:02:12 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: common denominator

We take up a collection from the liberals and give it to the poor, right?


59 posted on 03/02/2007 6:03:31 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: YOUGOTIT

What chance do you think this story would have getting published in 2009?


60 posted on 03/02/2007 6:05:19 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-78 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson