Posted on 02/25/2007 4:17:02 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Just what ARE Rudy's qualifications that make him the "BEST man to lead as CIC?"
Please, I'd really like to know.
Do none of our other Republican candidates even compare to Rudy's superior military/war experience and knowledge?
Jeez, push your buttons the slightest bit and the anti-conservative bile comes right out.
Great article...thanks
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=YjA5MzhhYTk5N2E2NzI3MTgwYWU4OTNkMWEyYWNhZWQ=
I guess you're talking about me.
It's a polite thing to do to ping the person you're talking about.
I asked you to provide a link to Hunter's stand on immigration. But instead you called me a troll. You called me a troll because his stand on immigration runs parallel to Bush.
Someone else provide the link to his official site and nothing is mentioned on immigration in his Core Principles. This tells me he's in lock step with Bush regarding immigration, both legal and illegal.
"McPain flew jets in Vietnam, but most of his time was spent in a POW camp (very possibly aiding the enemy)." "... time in REAL COMBAT."
I don't trust McCain and I don't want him to become president. I want him out of politics, period. Hunter has my interest and thus far, my respect.
However, your comment was discussing and beneath the dignity any good conservative or republican. YOU obviously weren't there, like many of us were. Take your garbage to a real Vet and say something like that to his face.....much of your's would be quickly rearranged!
Now, the next time that you drink from the toilet, leave the damn lid down, perhaps it wont fall onto your head and make you sound so damn stupid!
discussing = disgusting
Here, let me say it again, DISGUSTING.
Good night.
The link to his congressional site I listed shows the fence and other border issues he has delt with and still is.
If you don't want to check this site, then you don't want to know the truth.
I am also on another thread dealing with dim bulbs.
Yes, most newbees are trolls and this one is not as good as most. He needs to go back to DU troll school 101
SKUUUUUUUUUUzzzz me. I didn't realize that you were the magnificent ambAssador of the republican party. What pray tell will be my punishment if I refuse to leave?
Sorry to report, but I'm not going anywhere. And neither is Rudy G-man. Since a vote for Rudy the G-man is a vote for the liberal consensus. It would be a sin for me to not rebuke a gun grabbin liberal socialist under any circumstance.
I will make this prediction here now. Rudy will not get the nod.
When you get a chance you can read all its posts on this thread and all the posts to it. Not much doubt, its a troll.
You keep posting the same post and I keep answering with the same response.
He sounds very much like Bush on immigration.
How is Hunter going to reverse current immigration trends back to what they were, say, in 1950? What is going to do to undo the damage the Humpreys and Kennedys and Johnsons did to our country when they promised us that the the Act of 1965 would have no effect on the ethnic population percentages of the US?
I see America being transformed from an extension of European values and culture to one being claimed by massive hordes of illegal, third world aliens as they sweep away the values of our forefathers. What is Hunter, or Rudy or Romney going to do about it? Seems none are interested, except Tancredo. Well, neither am I interested in any of them.
"When you get a chance you can read all its [sic} posts on this thread and all the posts to it. Not much doubt, its [sic] a troll.
Am still waiting for your link on Hunter's stand on immigration, but I'll be waiting in vain as he's in agreement with Bush's policies.
Put a link on these threads for all to see, will you?
Good night.
Conservatives want a conservative candidate to win. We are in the primary race. Many of us think Hunter is the best candidate, so we support him. And we think Giuliani is not a good candidate, so we say what we don't like about him. We have about a year's worth of primary race ahead of us to weigh these things. But Giuliani's supporters just keep insisting that Hunter is not one of our choices, that we don't get to pick him, that we must put our beliefs and principles aside for the greater good, and that if we don't already choose Giuliani now, then the devil, I mean, then Hillary will win in 2008 and it will be our fault. Who again doesn't want the primaries? Who wants to veto the selection of candidates?
My own estimate is that it would be a very risky experiment, electorally, to nominate a social liberal as our Republican candidate. I would expect him to lose. So, until someone convinces me otherwise, I hardly appreciate being constantly accused of electing Hillary (or whatever Democrat) by not supporting Giuliani. As a purely practical means of winning the general election, I think we need to have a champion of conservative principles and values on the ballot. So my desire to keep Hillary out has me giving my support to whichever candidate I think can best do that, and I also want to dissuade support for a candidate who I think would lose, for example, Giuliani.
If abortion is higher up the list of your priorities than the WOT and the security of this nation and it's allies, then take this FRiendly piece of advice from a FReeper who still remains in the "undecided" camp: don't waste your time voting for Rudy. The last thing this country needs to do is fall back into that long slumber prior to 9/11.
When the terrorists want to kill us all, regardless of political ideology, everything else shouldn't matter.
For Rudy, 9/11 is personal.
With all due respect, if you'd told me that Bush would be able to deal effectively with the largest attack on the US since Pearl Harbor in 2000 I'd have laughed in your face.
The mere fact that Rudy dealth with it well doesn't mean that he's qualified by temperament or experience to be POTUS.
When the terrorists want to kill us all, regardless of political ideology, everything else shouldn't matter.
Agreed. But there's no reason to assume that Duncan Hunter wouldn't kill bad guys just as well as Rudy would. Rudy also has a whole bunch of his own baggage which makes him, for me at least, a non starter.
For Rudy, 9/11 is personal.
Bully for Rudy. But for me my 2nd Amendment rights are mighty personal, too.
And Rudy has a clear pattern of utter contempt for those.
L
I don't think we have to worry about Rudy grabbing up anyone's guns. Bush was called a gun-grabber and worse, Clinton too, and after all these years, us gun owners are all still clutching our firearms.
I disagree.
Rudy won't have the dubious benefit of a marginally Republican congress to kill another even stronger AWB.
Then there's his stance on infanticide. There's another deal breaker for me. He's come right out and said he'll gladly force me to pay for someone to kill their unborn child.
You may be comfortable with that, but I am most decidedly not.
Nope. As far as I'm concerned Rudy is completely unacceptable. He's a great mayor, not doubt. He did masterful work in NYC. But as President? No way.
L
I will not vote for him at sll
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.